midds

I don't think it is as clear as that, like he was suddenly undermined or undermined from the off. I think a few things lead to one another, culminating in the sale of Milner behind his back and the purchase of players behind his back also. The final straw if you like, the point of no going back. I'm mainly guessing here but I'll put this scenario to you. We just don't know what went on behind the scenes which makes it impossible to try to analyse what happened this summer. I'm still a bit stunned by the whole business and there have been so many theories that I've tied myself in knots trying to make sense of it all. All I know is that Keegan walked out on us at the absolute worst possible time. If him being undermined in the market was the main issue, why walk as soon as it no longer became an issue? It wouldn't have resurfaced until December as we approached Jan 1st. And if it was the main issue, why not walk as son as he had an inkling he wasn't in total charge of transfer policy? Those are my main problems with how it's panned out. I'm sure there's a perfectly good answer, and I'm probably missing it, but it doesn't add up.

Because then the club could have easily contradicted him by saying "but we were going to give Kevin all the funds he needed". Once the window closed, surely that was the point when he realised that he could do no more. Perhaps. If he was as highly-pincipled as HTT is making out I'd have thought he'd have been off like a shot regardless. As soon as Wise tells him the club are signing Gutierrez and telling him to find him on youtube should have been the trigger. This is just my opinion - but I think Keegan chose the exact time which would cause maximum hassle for Ashley, Wise et al. Unfortunately, in doing this he also drops the club in the shite too. I realise that might not please everyone but it's just what I think and we may never know exactly what went on to force him to walk. Who knows?

So, if he put his principles first, why did he walk out on the club hours after the transfer window closed and not as soon as he realised he was been undermined in the market?

Is Hughton in still charge?

The passion is fiery? That's a wind-up. No doubt. Not sure who it is but that's not real.

Nah.

I bet you said the word 'journalist' at least 4 times.

Eh? Ah, right. Mis-read it.

No-one is being forced to pay though, are they? It is a ridiculous amount of money to pay like.

Not perpetual enough.

Didn't last long. Sadly. Eh? Not watching the game, thought Spurs had equalised not the other way around. Nah, they fucked it up within a minute. The 67 seconds they held the lead for was the first time they've been leading a game this season according to Sky.

Still doesn't beat the Dabizas diving header own goal from a few years back.

He probs has not told his wife hes had the sack!! on a serious note though, wonder what he was doing down there, especially with his bloody tracksuit on?! seems very strange. I never wondered what he did in his spare time when he actually worked for us! Now he's picking up his giro again I care even less.

That is exactly what has happened. Some people are only happy when they've got something to be miserable about.

Dodgy pen for Kiev against Arsenal. 1-0

Yeah it's the Arabs who are dodgy with their debt clearing and money investing. Not like the likes of Ridsdale, Ellis, Bates and Shepherd. Fair enough. Replace 'Arab' with 'fucker'.

I'm guessing the mongs who wanted him out of the club asap are exactly the same mongs who'll whinge like fuck when he sells us to some dodgy Arab.

The system works.

I'm sorry but that's a pile of steaming shit, Guthrie's intentions were to hurt the guy that's got bugger all to do with this contact sport BS you spouted. I honestly think he deserves a very long suspension for this one. Good luck trying to prove that. Dear me!! come on man. Just re-read it and it doesn't make clear what I meant. I was just passing comment that it would be virtually impossible to prove he meant to hurt Fagan to the extent he actually did. How on earth would you go about proving Guthrie set out to break his leg?

You can't advertise alcohol in France iirc.

Hat's off like! Cracking goal.

Hopefully that might just simmer Beglin down, the fucking prick.

Giddy up.

And rightly so. Of course the damage players/people inflict on others in a deliberate action needs to be taken into consideration. It is how I see life, it is how I see football. I don't agree with setting the punishment in line with the damage it does to the player. I'm not talking about crimes or other aspects of life. Just tackles in football. He's going to get a 3 match ban and, imo, anything more than that would be harsh. You obviously don't agree and that's fine.