NUFC06

No thanks I rather have played young Carroll

Goals change games. If you don't score when you are on top, you pay for it. So, yes we still need forwards/strikers. Where on the field was the possession, how was the shape of the team ? Was it aimless sideways passing in midfield, or did we create chances up front ? The straight answer is no, so the conclusion is still that we need better quality forwards. I don't think too many people think we need forwards to be honest, but I'm more convinced than I ever was, that we need a striker and an attacking midfield player. First and foremost we need 1 LB,1 CB at least!!! And then we can think about other areas If you dont admit that you are out of your mind tbh I think if you don't think we need a striker, you are out of your mind. If we offer Sibierski new contract we will have: 1.Martins 2.Owen 3.Ameobi 4.Sibierski 5.Dyer 6.Carroll Can you tell me where this new striker will play especially when you consider the option its possible that we dont play in Europe next season=less games?? Now will you admit that first and foremost we need to sign defenders? no. Because basically, only Owen is good enough. Martins might be, and Dyer isn't a striker. That leaves 2 forwards, who may not play together. If you dont' score goals, you go down. I think that the team is poor in possession, and looks suspect at the back due to not imposing its presence on the opposition. The forward lacks support. If we do not sign a striker this summer - a good one - we will be in the s*** next year. Any money we have should be spent there. A good defender still struggles if they players in front of him are struggling. You can patch up at the back, if you have a leader. We need a leader, I'll give you that, but we will have to find one for a small fee. These 2 sentences are pretty shocking and i dont thing anyone will agree with what you are saying Its like saying that we are so s*** upfront that if we dont sign anyone there we will be f***** What about our defence? Your way of thinking is pretty strange i must say I don't care if you agree with me or not, or anyone else for that matter. I think your way of thinking is very strange, I can't imagine why you want to watch a team that cannot hold the ball, nor do I understand why you think a good defender or two will do anything to the shape of the team other than continue to fight a defensive battle against too many teams, too often. I respect your opinion My opinion though is that you dont understand anything about football Shame, but my opinion is that you don't understand anything about football. How long have you supported NUFC BTW, who do you think are the best players you have seen play for the club, and why ? Who is the best team you have seen play against Newcastle ? Why do you think we didn't win the league in 1996 ? As for the current team, why do you think that Ameobi, Sibierski, and Carrol [at the moment] and Dyer are good enough strikers for a team with supposed ambition ? You do have ambition, do you ? And you are aware that if Martins had been injured this season we would now be in serious relegation trouble - have a look at the league table and see how many goals the bottom teams score ? Do you think that Martins and Owen will play together successfully ? You actually must do, unless you really rate Ameobi .... why do you think he is good enough ? You have watched the team be outplayed by many teams this season I take it, scoring goals against the run of play, the away game at Spurs is an outstanding example. How do you think a defender will help us attempt to dominate these teams who are better than us at passing and moving ? For sure they are better then your defence I guess you have some kind of obsession about strikers Aye,lets sign 2 strikers because Dyer and Ameobi are not good enough back up fro Martins and Owen :uglystupid2: And next season lets play Carr-Ramage-Huntington-Babayaro at the back :uglystupid2: Well, I think you have an obsession with full backs. I don't agree that any money we have would be better spent on the defence. Football may be a fairly simple game when you are kicking the ball around for the pub on a sunday morning, and a clogger or two at the back will improve you, but the higher up you go the more important possession becomes. Anyone who knows anything about professional football knows that. I don't believe I have suggested playing those 4 players anywhere, but keep on making things up, are you trolling or something ? I don't fancy the idea of playing Ameobi and Luque up front next season, do you ? Or going the whole season with Butt and Parker in central midfield either....stand by for another season of conceding possession and fighting a defensive battle against the decent teams if we do. The only way you can beat these teams who outmove and outpass you, and get consistent results and performances, is to outmove and outpass them. This is what football at these levels is all about. I know alot more than you about football because im ex footballer and although i played in the lower leagues i know thing or two about football I doubt that you have ever kicked a ball So please dont talk to me about football So its only you that think its better for us to spend all of our money on strikers End of thread

Goals change games. If you don't score when you are on top, you pay for it. So, yes we still need forwards/strikers. Where on the field was the possession, how was the shape of the team ? Was it aimless sideways passing in midfield, or did we create chances up front ? The straight answer is no, so the conclusion is still that we need better quality forwards. I don't think too many people think we need forwards to be honest, but I'm more convinced than I ever was, that we need a striker and an attacking midfield player. First and foremost we need 1 LB,1 CB at least!!! And then we can think about other areas If you dont admit that you are out of your mind tbh I think if you don't think we need a striker, you are out of your mind. If we offer Sibierski new contract we will have: 1.Martins 2.Owen 3.Ameobi 4.Sibierski 5.Dyer 6.Carroll Can you tell me where this new striker will play especially when you consider the option its possible that we dont play in Europe next season=less games?? Now will you admit that first and foremost we need to sign defenders? no. Because basically, only Owen is good enough. Martins might be, and Dyer isn't a striker. That leaves 2 forwards, who may not play together. If you dont' score goals, you go down. I think that the team is poor in possession, and looks suspect at the back due to not imposing its presence on the opposition. The forward lacks support. If we do not sign a striker this summer - a good one - we will be in the s*** next year. Any money we have should be spent there. A good defender still struggles if they players in front of him are struggling. You can patch up at the back, if you have a leader. We need a leader, I'll give you that, but we will have to find one for a small fee. These 2 sentences are pretty shocking and i dont thing anyone will agree with what you are saying Its like saying that we are so s*** upfront that if we dont sign anyone there we will be f***** What about our defence? Your way of thinking is pretty strange i must say I don't care if you agree with me or not, or anyone else for that matter. I think your way of thinking is very strange, I can't imagine why you want to watch a team that cannot hold the ball, nor do I understand why you think a good defender or two will do anything to the shape of the team other than continue to fight a defensive battle against too many teams, too often. I respect your opinion My opinion though is that you dont understand anything about football Shame, but my opinion is that you don't understand anything about football. How long have you supported NUFC BTW, who do you think are the best players you have seen play for the club, and why ? Who is the best team you have seen play against Newcastle ? Why do you think we didn't win the league in 1996 ? As for the current team, why do you think that Ameobi, Sibierski, and Carrol [at the moment] and Dyer are good enough strikers for a team with supposed ambition ? You do have ambition, do you ? And you are aware that if Martins had been injured this season we would now be in serious relegation trouble - have a look at the league table and see how many goals the bottom teams score ? Do you think that Martins and Owen will play together successfully ? You actually must do, unless you really rate Ameobi .... why do you think he is good enough ? You have watched the team be outplayed by many teams this season I take it, scoring goals against the run of play, the away game at Spurs is an outstanding example. How do you think a defender will help us attempt to dominate these teams who are better than us at passing and moving ? For sure they are better then your defence I guess you have some kind of obsession about strikers Aye,lets sign 2 strikers because Dyer and Ameobi are not good enough back up fro Martins and Owen :uglystupid2: And next season lets play Carr-Ramage-Huntington-Babayaro at the back :uglystupid2:

scottish football = utter s**** according to NUFC06 'we should be aiming higher than that' or some other such s**** In Scotland they are only 2 clubs Rangers and Celtic Thats why every year each of them is champion And you can go and f*** off with your Steven Pressley I see Hibernian won the CIS cup. Aye, Hibernian. Hibs. The Hibees. Not Celtic. Not Rangers. Hibernian. When was the last time some other club besides Rangers and Celtic became champions of Scotland?

You really are pathetic tbh I only watched the 2nd half and i must say that besides the penalty he didnt do anything else

Goals change games. If you don't score when you are on top, you pay for it. So, yes we still need forwards/strikers. Where on the field was the possession, how was the shape of the team ? Was it aimless sideways passing in midfield, or did we create chances up front ? The straight answer is no, so the conclusion is still that we need better quality forwards. I don't think too many people think we need forwards to be honest, but I'm more convinced than I ever was, that we need a striker and an attacking midfield player. First and foremost we need 1 LB,1 CB at least!!! And then we can think about other areas If you dont admit that you are out of your mind tbh I think if you don't think we need a striker, you are out of your mind. If we offer Sibierski new contract we will have: 1.Martins 2.Owen 3.Ameobi 4.Sibierski 5.Dyer 6.Carroll Can you tell me where this new striker will play especially when you consider the option its possible that we dont play in Europe next season=less games?? Now will you admit that first and foremost we need to sign defenders? no. Because basically, only Owen is good enough. Martins might be, and Dyer isn't a striker. That leaves 2 forwards, who may not play together. If you dont' score goals, you go down. I think that the team is poor in possession, and looks suspect at the back due to not imposing its presence on the opposition. The forward lacks support. If we do not sign a striker this summer - a good one - we will be in the s*** next year. Any money we have should be spent there. A good defender still struggles if they players in front of him are struggling. You can patch up at the back, if you have a leader. We need a leader, I'll give you that, but we will have to find one for a small fee. These 2 sentences are pretty shocking and i dont thing anyone will agree with what you are saying Its like saying that we are so s*** upfront that if we dont sign anyone there we will be f***** What about our defence? Your way of thinking is pretty strange i must say I don't care if you agree with me or not, or anyone else for that matter. I think your way of thinking is very strange, I can't imagine why you want to watch a team that cannot hold the ball, nor do I understand why you think a good defender or two will do anything to the shape of the team other than continue to fight a defensive battle against too many teams, too often. I respect your opinion My opinion though is that you dont understand anything about football

scottish football = utter s**** according to NUFC06 'we should be aiming higher than that' or some other such s**** In Scotland they are only 2 clubs Rangers and Celtic Thats why every year each of them is champion And you can go and fuck off with your Steven Pressley

Ihaaaaaaaaaaaaa by the way this 7th place is still available for us It depends where we will finish 7th or 17th ;D

Surely he's at the game no? I doubt it And its no surpise he is not here He is here only when they are wining

Bye bye spurs ;D Where is that naughty spurs fan???

What a goal by Sheva

Good news although im still not impressed with Emre's career so far.I think he wasnt anything special when he played for us and also is injured too often I think people are praising him so much because of the shit partnership between Butt and Parker When he played this season his delievery was shocking and his goalscoring record is non existent I think Taylor has more goals then Emre overall too Still good news though

Goals change games. If you don't score when you are on top, you pay for it. So, yes we still need forwards/strikers. Where on the field was the possession, how was the shape of the team ? Was it aimless sideways passing in midfield, or did we create chances up front ? The straight answer is no, so the conclusion is still that we need better quality forwards. I don't think too many people think we need forwards to be honest, but I'm more convinced than I ever was, that we need a striker and an attacking midfield player. First and foremost we need 1 LB,1 CB at least!!! And then we can think about other areas If you dont admit that you are out of your mind tbh I think if you don't think we need a striker, you are out of your mind. If we offer Sibierski new contract we will have: 1.Martins 2.Owen 3.Ameobi 4.Sibierski 5.Dyer 6.Carroll Can you tell me where this new striker will play especially when you consider the option its possible that we dont play in Europe next season=less games?? Now will you admit that first and foremost we need to sign defenders? no. Because basically, only Owen is good enough. Martins might be, and Dyer isn't a striker. That leaves 2 forwards, who may not play together. If you dont' score goals, you go down. I think that the team is poor in possession, and looks suspect at the back due to not imposing its presence on the opposition. The forward lacks support. If we do not sign a striker this summer - a good one - we will be in the s*** next year. Any money we have should be spent there. A good defender still struggles if they players in front of him are struggling. You can patch up at the back, if you have a leader. We need a leader, I'll give you that, but we will have to find one for a small fee. These 2 sentences are pretty shocking and i dont thing anyone will agree with what you are saying Its like saying that we are so shit upfront that if we dont sign anyone there we will be fucked What about our defence? Your way of thinking is pretty strange i must say

im not 100% sure that he signed that contract extension

Bramble must go after the AZ performance Solano-give him 2 more years Moore-he is out to Australia anyway Sibierski-release him and look for someone younger Srnicek-release him Edgar-give him 4-5 year contract Bernard-its more and more obvious that he will never be the player he was-release him Alan O'Brien-i doubt he will play games for the 1st team-release him Kristopher Gate-? Philip Adam Cave-? Anyone have other opinions about the players we should release?

Goals change games. If you don't score when you are on top, you pay for it. So, yes we still need forwards/strikers. Where on the field was the possession, how was the shape of the team ? Was it aimless sideways passing in midfield, or did we create chances up front ? The straight answer is no, so the conclusion is still that we need better quality forwards. I don't think too many people think we need forwards to be honest, but I'm more convinced than I ever was, that we need a striker and an attacking midfield player. First and foremost we need 1 LB,1 CB at least!!! And then we can think about other areas If you dont admit that you are out of your mind tbh I think if you don't think we need a striker, you are out of your mind. If we offer Sibierski new contract we will have: 1.Martins 2.Owen 3.Ameobi 4.Sibierski 5.Dyer 6.Carroll Can you tell me where this new striker will play especially when you consider the option its possible that we dont play in Europe next season=less games?? Now will you admit that first and foremost we need to sign defenders?

i think he still havent sign his contract extension and i hope we didnt offer him one He is past his best and is too slow We should be looking for some young striker who can be backup to Owen,Martins and Ameobi

What??

We'll lose by 2 goal margin imo

Goals change games. If you don't score when you are on top, you pay for it. So, yes we still need forwards/strikers. Where on the field was the possession, how was the shape of the team ? Was it aimless sideways passing in midfield, or did we create chances up front ? The straight answer is no, so the conclusion is still that we need better quality forwards. I don't think too many people think we need forwards to be honest, but I'm more convinced than I ever was, that we need a striker and an attacking midfield player. First and foremost we need 1 LB,1 CB at least!!! And then we can think about other areas If you dont admit that you are out of your mind tbh

The people who are saying that we need strikers rather than defenders because we dont keep enough possession just dont understand anything about football Against AZ in the 1st game if we had solid defence the game should probably have finished 3:0 or 4:1 In the 2nd leg if we had solid defence to keep 0:0 for at least the second half the pace of Martins and Dyer should have destroyed them on the counter For example against Liverpool Barcelona had 60% possession in the both legs but didnt manage to do anything with it Sir Alex Ferguson said it long time ago:Quality defenders wins you things

Im thinking the same way you are. IMO at the moment Spurs are far better team than us.Maybe as individuals we are equal but as a team they are better.They play fantastic football and are going in the right direction.And although i hate them as much as you do i cant deny the fact that they have overcome us as a club True or not, don't bloody say that. Maybe not far,far better but still better than us For example:can you really think its possible under Glenn Roeder to be leading Chelsea 3:1 at half time at Stamford Bridge?

Roeder should be released after the last game of the premiership Until the last game if Shepherd really intends to sack Roeder must try to find the right man for the job so immediately after the end of the season the new man to step up Everything other will be stupid as far as it concerned replacing Roeder

Can someone tell me whats the price going to be? If its pre-order is it going to be more expensive?

Appointing Shearer as a manager is going to be huge risk but i think he will do better job then Roeder He has enormous respect from all the players and im sure he will get 100% from every one of them He is great motivator and also can bring some quality players because Alan Shearer is notorious everywhere around the world,especially in England The only problem that stand is Alan Shearer ready to manager big club like Newcastle? Roy Keane is doing great job.Of course in the Championship but still... Its huge risk but i'll take it because Shearer will do better job than this mouse Roeder