SEMTEX

It amazes you that they'd like to try something different than Giroud? You must be easily amazed. I envy you.

eheheh

Rip USA

If they bid £7bn for him and agreed to loan him back to Leicester for the next 5 years.

Based on 1 tweet with no numbers you've come to the conclusion of "awful business".

Probably. If the poll was "Is Pardew a racist? Yes or no", then I'd have to go with yes.

Same.

Why not have competition at the GK spot? I see no issue from Leicester's perspective. In fact it's very good for them.... Why Ronny Rob would make the move is a little more questionable. Clearly wants money + CL over playing time, or thinks he's better than wor kasps.

He was the man utd fella right? Was good on FM..

http://i.imgur.com/MxD2j5m.png I don't know what I expected. Very tempted to grant him his wish.

Just sent an email to my entire company to see if I can run such a thing there. Expecting a large amount of razzing in return. Hold me.

Same. 5 player me.

I was under the impression teams normally play with ~11 people, but I'll take your word for it

Which is still significantly better than not qualifying until they changed the rules to allow the also rans in.

Raging alcoholic is adored by Irishes. Quelle Surprise.

De Bruyne is better than any player England have had in the last 200 years

Only team with a 100% win record in qualifiers marra.

If Sturridge was bang in form and fully fit, I'd start him with Kane. He's a better player than Vardy. As he's not fit, hasn't played in the recent friendlies and has had a mixed season on the whole, Vardy starts. He can still be a big asset off the bench though IMO, even if not 100% fit. I like Sturridge, but as you say, he's out of form, and semi injured. You say that england are making the same mistakes again by picking a player just because he's at a big team, but I would make the point that they're making the same mistake again by picking a half-injured player who is out of form, purely because of his reputation. I want form/confidence/health in my squad, and therefore Rashford is the preferable option. Although I would've been fine with bringing neither tbh.

... you'd play Sturridge ahead of Kane and Vardy then.............?

I much prefer the Rashford pick over an injured Sturridge. He's the 3rd choice striker at best and has a knock. He's expendable. EXPEND HIM.

So we've got Vardy, Kane, Rooney, Sturridge (inj) and Rashford that can play upfront? And we play 1 striker. Or sometimes if we're lucky, one striker with another one shoehorned into a wing position? I'll be shocked if either "Studge" or Rashford see a minute of playing time.

stop being so negative lets go for zlatan

Can't blame West Ham for chronic mismanagement at Milan like. Even if they are West Ham.

CRY YOUNG GIRL. CRY

Weak