Jump to content

NE5

Member
  • Posts

    10,817
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. only makes our many thrown away points worse. Its unlikely Hull, us would win and the mackems lose, but you never know.
  2. is it finished ? Ideal end to the season. We win, Hull win, mackems lose
  3. me too fucking diabolical thread btw but completely acceptable apparently. strange. your objections are noted. Not that I consider it to be any different to the abuse hurled at the ex directors of the club in other threads, the ones who actually delivered support to the manager and regular european competition. Still, I suppose that was strangely acceptable to you. Perhaps worth noting, again for some who slate me yet again for having a realistic outlook, is that the only point I want right now is 1 for us and 0 for Hull on Sunday. i didnt mention the board once and still get trolled about it. its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway? From memory, I think what happens is that this thread is allowed to get to about 100 pages & then people are sent PMs warning them for posting in it. it happened and it didnt work. plan b? you know that encouraging the banning of other posters is a bannable offence too don't you ? Have you nowt else to say man I started this thread, its had plenty of hits, thats what its all about. If any mod or admin wish to ask me to lock it, then I will. wondering why the mods warn people then dont act when the warnings are ignored is quite different. oddly enough, the thing you mention is indeed a bannable offence but blatant trolling isnt. how fucked up is that on a popular football forum? "Trolling" because its fact contrary to your opinion ? Bugger off man. If you want to go on a message board where everybody agrees with you - it doesn't exist ? Nobody asked you to post in this thread, which I started. You do know that encouraging posters to be banned is a bannable offence on its own merits don't you ? Aren't you now "trolling" Last post I make to you in this thread, why don't you do the same. Another fact is that I often posted that better replacements than the old board would be hard to find, which was also regarded as "trolling". Still think so ?
  4. me too fucking diabolical thread btw but completely acceptable apparently. strange. your objections are noted. Not that I consider it to be any different to the abuse hurled at the ex directors of the club in other threads, the ones who actually delivered support to the manager and regular european competition. Still, I suppose that was strangely acceptable to you. Perhaps worth noting, again for some who slate me yet again for having a realistic outlook, is that the only point I want right now is 1 for us and 0 for Hull on Sunday. i didnt mention the board once and still get trolled about it. its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway? From memory, I think what happens is that this thread is allowed to get to about 100 pages & then people are sent PMs warning them for posting in it. it happened and it didnt work. plan b? you know that encouraging the banning of other posters is a bannable offence too don't you ? Have you nowt else to say man I started this thread, its had plenty of hits, thats what its all about. If any mod or admin wish to ask me to lock it, then I will.
  5. NE5

    Hotmail

    is there a limit to the amount of characters you can put into an email ? For the 2nd time in a few weeks, an email I've been sent has gone missing, it never arrived to me and didn't go into the other persons out box ?
  6. me too fucking diabolical thread btw but completely acceptable apparently. strange. your objections are noted. Not that I consider it to be any different to the abuse hurled at the ex directors of the club in other threads, the ones who actually delivered support to the manager and regular european competition. Still, I suppose that was strangely acceptable to you. Perhaps worth noting, again for some who slate me yet again for having a realistic outlook, is that the only point I want right now is 1 for us and 0 for Hull on Sunday. i didnt mention the board once and still get trolled about it. its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway? eer.....how many posts were started that slated Shepherd ? Thousands. Were they not about the board too ? Or was it that you [foolishly] agreed with them ? i dont even know what that means or how it relates to what i just posted. I'm not surprised you don't know what it means. You will still say the Halls and Shepherd were shite if it takes 20 years to qualify for europe again. Why have you hijacked this thread when you have nothing to add to it ? Hijacked this thread. nothing to stop you admitting that the Halls and Shepherd were better than you said either jimmymag. Don't expect you to though. That post was to Libertine by the way Every community, even small villages, have their own idiot and your ours. Keep up the good work. aye sure jimmy lad. Shame you didn't bother replying to either this, or other occasions when facts and results completely stump your "opinion" that a board that qualifies for europe regularly and backs their managers is shit. One day, the penny will drop with people like you. Maybe in 20 years time when we haven't played in europe again.
  7. No. I don't think anyone does either. Apparently being unhappy with the last year or three under the previous board means you support him though. actually, aside of the fact that most DID support him in the foolish belief that pretty much anybody would be better than his predecessors, what I still find absolutely amazing is the amount of people who STILL don't understand that they were a good board. Incredible.
  8. me too fucking diabolical thread btw but completely acceptable apparently. strange. your objections are noted. Not that I consider it to be any different to the abuse hurled at the ex directors of the club in other threads, the ones who actually delivered support to the manager and regular european competition. Still, I suppose that was strangely acceptable to you. Perhaps worth noting, again for some who slate me yet again for having a realistic outlook, is that the only point I want right now is 1 for us and 0 for Hull on Sunday. i didnt mention the board once and still get trolled about it. its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway? eer.....how many posts were started that slated Shepherd ? Thousands. Were they not about the board too ? Or was it that you [foolishly] agreed with them ? i dont even know what that means or how it relates to what i just posted. I'm not surprised you don't know what it means. You will still say the Halls and Shepherd were shite if it takes 20 years to qualify for europe again. Why have you hijacked this thread when you have nothing to add to it ? again, what? that last line is the height of irony. (its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway?) change your patter man. height of irony. never really noticed you until you started repeating that last line over and over again.
  9. me too fucking diabolical thread btw but completely acceptable apparently. strange. your objections are noted. Not that I consider it to be any different to the abuse hurled at the ex directors of the club in other threads, the ones who actually delivered support to the manager and regular european competition. Still, I suppose that was strangely acceptable to you. Perhaps worth noting, again for some who slate me yet again for having a realistic outlook, is that the only point I want right now is 1 for us and 0 for Hull on Sunday. i didnt mention the board once and still get trolled about it. its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway? eer.....how many posts were started that slated Shepherd ? Thousands. Were they not about the board too ? Or was it that you [foolishly] agreed with them ? i dont even know what that means or how it relates to what i just posted. I'm not surprised you don't know what it means. You will still say the Halls and Shepherd were shite if it takes 20 years to qualify for europe again. Why have you hijacked this thread when you have nothing to add to it ? again, what? that last line is the height of irony. (its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway?) change your patter man.
  10. me too fucking diabolical thread btw but completely acceptable apparently. strange. your objections are noted. Not that I consider it to be any different to the abuse hurled at the ex directors of the club in other threads, the ones who actually delivered support to the manager and regular european competition. Still, I suppose that was strangely acceptable to you. Perhaps worth noting, again for some who slate me yet again for having a realistic outlook, is that the only point I want right now is 1 for us and 0 for Hull on Sunday. i didnt mention the board once and still get trolled about it. its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway? eer.....how many posts were started that slated Shepherd ? Thousands. Were they not about the board too ? Or was it that you [foolishly] agreed with them ? i dont even know what that means or how it relates to what i just posted. I'm not surprised you don't know what it means. You will still say the Halls and Shepherd were shite if it takes 20 years to qualify for europe again. Why have you hijacked this thread when you have nothing to add to it ? Hijacked this thread. nothing to stop you admitting that the Halls and Shepherd were better than you said either jimmymag. Don't expect you to though. That post was to Libertine by the way
  11. me too fucking diabolical thread btw but completely acceptable apparently. strange. your objections are noted. Not that I consider it to be any different to the abuse hurled at the ex directors of the club in other threads, the ones who actually delivered support to the manager and regular european competition. Still, I suppose that was strangely acceptable to you. Perhaps worth noting, again for some who slate me yet again for having a realistic outlook, is that the only point I want right now is 1 for us and 0 for Hull on Sunday. i didnt mention the board once and still get trolled about it. its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway? eer.....how many posts were started that slated Shepherd ? Thousands. Were they not about the board too ? Or was it that you [foolishly] agreed with them ? i dont even know what that means or how it relates to what i just posted. I'm not surprised you don't know what it means. You will still say the Halls and Shepherd were shite if it takes 20 years to qualify for europe again. Why have you hijacked this thread when you have nothing to add to it ?
  12. so you are happy with the policy that is about to send us down ? Well done. At least you admit it mind, credit for that. Which is the point of the thread and why I started it. Why don't these others also admit the same ?
  13. me too fucking diabolical thread btw but completely acceptable apparently. strange. your objections are noted. Not that I consider it to be any different to the abuse hurled at the ex directors of the club in other threads, the ones who actually delivered support to the manager and regular european competition. Still, I suppose that was strangely acceptable to you. Perhaps worth noting, again for some who slate me yet again for having a realistic outlook, is that the only point I want right now is 1 for us and 0 for Hull on Sunday. i didnt mention the board once and still get trolled about it. its like those warning PM's didnt happen. what was the point in them anyway? eer.....how many posts were started that slated Shepherd ? Thousands. Were they not about the board too ? Or was it that you [foolishly] agreed with them ?
×
×
  • Create New...