Alberto2005

GMTV? Jeremy Kyle sorry.

Apparently he's on ITV in the morning.

The one he cheated on

We love each other really. We love each other really. ;);););)

I'm not, I just don't want him as first choice RB and I think a few appearances here and there for Chelsea in the absence of anyone else are making people think he's better than he is in that position. If he was any good back there, he'd not be going for nowt. didn't Chelsea offer Bridge to us on August 30 for next to nowt, says more about the club than the player agree that he's not ideal as first choice RB but he's a country mile ahead of anything we've played there in recent seasons Doubt it, i can understand why people may not be so excited after how the other ex Chelsea lot have done.

:lol:

I understand your point now, it's because you were replying from my quote so i assumed it was directed at me.

Contradicts your point then doesn't it. Hilario's a good comparison because it shows s**** can start for Chelsea if they have enough men out. Mourinho said at one point that we were well off with Edgar and Huntington, which tells you the extent of their defensive crisis. If Geremi was considered good enough to start ahead of those two, how come he only started 15 league games? because for the other 23 league games he was considered not good enough to start ahead of those two? Contradicts your point then doesn't it. not really, Hilario was never considered good enough to be first choice was he? No but you said when Ferreira and Boularouz were fit, Cudicini and Cech weren't. right, which is why Hilario is a bad comparison, are we going round in circles for the hell of it or what? So if Hilario is a bad comparison why did you use him as one? Wullie did, I think you need to read the thread, my point was he was a 'bad' comparison Yes i know, that's what baffles me as you used him as one shortly after unless it was undetected sarcasm?

Aye.

Contradicts your point then doesn't it. Hilario's a good comparison because it shows s**** can start for Chelsea if they have enough men out. Mourinho said at one point that we were well off with Edgar and Huntington, which tells you the extent of their defensive crisis. If Geremi was considered good enough to start ahead of those two, how come he only started 15 league games? because for the other 23 league games he was considered not good enough to start ahead of those two? Contradicts your point then doesn't it. not really, Hilario was never considered good enough to be first choice was he? No but you said when Ferreira and Boularouz were fit, Cudicini and Cech weren't. right, which is why Hilario is a bad comparison, are we going round in circles for the hell of it or what? So if Hilario is a bad comparison why did you use him as one?

Contradicts your point then doesn't it. Hilario's a good comparison because it shows s**** can start for Chelsea if they have enough men out. Mourinho said at one point that we were well off with Edgar and Huntington, which tells you the extent of their defensive crisis. If Geremi was considered good enough to start ahead of those two, how come he only started 15 league games? because for the other 23 league games he was considered not good enough to start ahead of those two? Contradicts your point then doesn't it. not really, Hilario was never considered good enough to be first choice was he? No but you said when Ferreira and Boularouz were fit, Cudicini and Cech weren't.

Jon Champion's words when that goal went in will stay with me for a long time "Bobby Robson does a jig of delight on the touchline and then remembers he's nearly 69" Yeh i remember

Contradicts your point then doesn't it. Hilario's a good comparison because it shows s**** can start for Chelsea if they have enough men out. Mourinho said at one point that we were well off with Edgar and Huntington, which tells you the extent of their defensive crisis. If Geremi was considered good enough to start ahead of those two, how come he only started 15 league games? because for the other 23 league games he was considered not good enough to start ahead of those two? Contradicts your point then doesn't it.

Geremi has never ever played thirty games a season under Mourinho. 24 last season. No need to be petty over a few games, the point still stands. You just said he played 30 odd games a season! Last season, he started 15 league games - and that's the most he's ever played since Ranieiri was there. Your point doesn't stand. He was there to fill in because of a defensive crisis, same reason Michael Essien played at centre back. 30 odd, 24. A few games difference. considering Chelsea play roughly 60 a season I wasn't that far out. Chelsea play in more than the premiership as well. So I think my point is valid. Disagree if you like, it doesn't really bother me. He was saying you said 30 games a season when really he's played 24 games just this season but not in previous ones. Ok. He still plays a hell of a lot for a so called "back up". If he played that much he'd fit into your criteria of playing in the double championship team wouldn't he.

Geremi has never ever played thirty games a season under Mourinho. 24 last season. No need to be petty over a few games, the point still stands. You just said he played 30 odd games a season! Last season, he started 15 league games - and that's the most he's ever played since Ranieiri was there. Your point doesn't stand. He was there to fill in because of a defensive crisis, same reason Michael Essien played at centre back. 30 odd, 24. A few games difference. considering Chelsea play roughly 60 a season I wasn't that far out. Chelsea play in more than the premiership as well. So I think my point is valid. Disagree if you like, it doesn't really bother me. He was saying you said 30 games a season when really he's played 24 games just this season but not in previous ones.

come on, Solano has done well for us there but you can't possibly think he's as effective as Geremi They're both right wingers who can do a job further back. Just because Geremi's played there for Chelsea doesn't make him any better. i know, but Geremi has the attributes to play back there. Solano has the intelligence and very little else I agree Geremi is infinitely faster, stronger and more athletic. Also a better tackler. We'll see. I'd rather not have a right winger who Boro fans thought shirked his defensive duties at right back. Nah, I'd rather have a player whom Jose Mourinho considered good enough to play there for the double champions. Oh right, we'll sign Hilario too then, yeah? f****** hell. Hilario played a few games for them in his career whereas Geremi played 30 odd games a season. f****** hell Obviously not..

Loved that Derby game My personal favourite was our victory away to Leeds United, 3-1 down against a very good side away from home to win it with a last minute Solano goal was brilliant

Did you hear? Berbatov's off to Man Yoo

Gets around a bit Lampard doesn't he,

expiring.

Nope, you missed the bit just before when they said "Everything we are about to say is a lie....Newcastle United could tonight tie up the signing of..."

Geremi thread...

Seen him a few times in the champions league, very fast player who generally plays wing back, couldn't give a full opinion on him though, heard a lot of promising things about him.

Honestly you are kidding me right? You are seriously not using that to back up your claim that he's world class? I have to agree with you on that one that's pretty poor backup.

He's not world class but he's not as bad as your making him out to be. He's an average La Liga player who's played above his station and gets away with it because of the quality around him. He's made a lot more of his ability than he should of imo. I simply cannot state how much we do not need this type of player, it will only take time for myself to be proven right about him if he comes to our club. Works both ways, you say he gets more credit because of the quality around him but in the same token your inclined to criticize him because of the quality of around him, he's not at their level.