AyeDubbleYoo

That’s fine for us as well though, right? He’s still under contract and if wants to wait until the end of the window to sign a new one then it’s fine?

When was he deemed unfit to do the job?

Nothing in Edward’s article is really surprising. The thing I can’t believe is that our entire transfer shortlist is just big-name PL players who are linked with every club in the world. I mean, a kid who plays FIFA could put together that list without any bother. Doesn’t really ring true to me given the signings we’ve made before - undervalued or overlooked players often from outside the league or who weren’t playing regularly due to injury etc. Maybe we decided this summer was the one to go big on one or two obvious players but I find it hard to believe that is the full strategy.

Like I said before, we don’t seem to be executing very well at the moment (although there are many mitigating factors IMO). But what we do know is that everyone at the club is fully focused on improvement and progress. So in that sense I can’t get too wound up about missing out on some players. As you say though, it would be nice if the learning happened quickly and we have some realistic targets still on the list.

I feel like we should be very attractive to players, Liverpool and Man City can't sign everyone. We can't possibly just have had 2 forwards and 1 keeper on our shortlist, so let's hope the rest are in the works. TBH losing Isak is all I can think about anyway.

The word attempt has never done so much work.

"I can't keep up" - stop posting then you dweeb

Not liking Elanga?

I don't even have twitter but helpfully everyone repeats the stuff here.

That's nowhere near enough money.

One thing we can be sure of is that we will learn and implement whatever we think we need to do to give us the best chance of success. I guess that's what we thought we were doing with Ashworth and then Mitchell.

Hard to say given how few shots he faces.

Repairing the roof.

He won't be first choice now I guess, unless Ederson is being sold? Not sure they'll make a profit on him either, this feels like his peak value move if he's not going to play regularly.

I think it's obvious we would.

I don't think that's a confirmed list of who we're registering.

Did we ever think Man City would buy him? A lot of people didn’t even think he was good enough for us to buy.

Am I misunderstanding the clause here? I felt like Man City would always have a chance to buy him back? Or is there reason to believe we could’ve pinched him?

It stings but that doesn’t mean you necessarily have to blame us, does it? Man City had an advantage built in.

Preach, it's genuinely giving me mental health problems.

It would be a worse error if it wasn't for Man City's first refusal clause, surely? I think it was reasonable to think they wouldn't be interested in buying him and wouldn't exercise their option. Obviously I don't know the inner workings of the conversations.

Nothing personal, I’m just not on twitter to avoid this dross. I expect a higher standard of content from N-O

His stamina is terrible TBF.

For a striker this always seemed the most likely option, assuming we keep Isak obviously.

There literally is no reason to be reposting shite tweets from Liverpool fans.