cubaricho

Feel exactly the same way.

Looks like a rugby kit.

This, an often overlooked aspect of a team that get's "too many" penalties.

Will be a 4-4-2 I can almost guarantee it.

Leeds play some ugggggllly football. Hoof it up, defend, repeat.

and no Shola?

The idea of not starting Rooney is madness. Location: Orlando, FL We'll beat you anyway , but I don't see what that has to do with anything. Rooney obviously has to play but at what expense? Chemistry? Playing him as a lone striker? I can see that going terribly south.

You could argue that the sales of Milner and Woodgate are why we are in such a great financial situation compared to most. Like Ian quite rightly said - it all goes to the bottom line.

Rooney, Defoe, Crouch, and Bent for me. Would be tempted to start Defoe and Crouch to be honest - they get to play with each other week-in/week-out and have a good understanding. Would give them the first 45 then bring Rooney on 'cause it's hard to leave him out as he's playing out of his skin this season.

Would take Colo over Woodgate every day of the week. Colo has a bit more class about him and is fit far more often.

He's been on loan in Egypt as far as I know. They canceled that loan for him to come play in the Prem.

5/6 years ago Keller was the starting keeper at Tottenham, and they went out and bought Paul Robinson-- because he was the better keeper. Just saying.... They thought he was better, that's for sure. He also had age on his side unlike Keller. Oh, and Robinson is English too.

Would go with either Hart or Green to be honest, and I'd probably side with Hart because I think he needs to at least be starting to be groomed as a replacement. Put him on the big stage and see if he can rise.

Then why choose Hart? It's ridiculous to think that it'll happen, but I dont think it's ridiculous to suggest that he's good enough for 3rd choice. Hart is performing consistently well in the Premier League. He also has a full cap already. In one of those meaningless friendlies you mentioned above?

Altidore doing anything?

Yeah don't take the keeper with the least amount of goals this season - that would be madness! James, Hart, and Harper for me.

That's what I would want to see played. Won't happen though.

You're right, I'm sorry. We sent him out on loan 'cause he's shit and we're trying to get a fee for him, that gay blade. Carroll and Ranger are both clearly better than him at playing football AND being men!

I feel like we sent him out on loan to keep him match fit for when/if we go back up into the Prem. He's clearly of top-flight caliber and the powers that be probably didn't want to off-load him just yet after he didn't get a fair crack at it here the first season.

How do you take a team from Champions League football in 2003 to relegation in 2009? Takes something 'special' imo. Your sense of entitlement is almost as bad as a Red Sox fan's

He's a decent player. I don't dispute that. Just not a great goalscorer. He never has been, either. It would be a mistake to sign him thinking he will score at a high rate. He hasn't been a great goal scorer at a top-flight level. He would run the Championship.

Voted Williamson. Our coaches will help him more than Routledge - they will just coach all the footballing out of Routledge I imagine.

Win win for Keane if you ask me. Can get his name back in the headlines and get back to full fitness and come back to the Prem and prove a few people wrong, especially because he'll be brimming with confidence which is what all strikers need.

A lot of that could be down to the squad he's playing with. Can't score goals with any service.

He's Irish, yeah?