cp40

9 stays 9, its better to have shearer than houghton and calderwood, but our players are still shit.

im not sad enough to trawl through past posts to form an argument, I know exactly what happened. Ashley was backed before and during January, by plenty of people on here. Take a look at the state of the club, hes great isnt he,..lol

lose an argument, resort to name calling,... well done.

why would you get banned ? I don't know what his major intention was, what do you think it was ? I'm GUESSING that he didn't understand football too much, looked at our crowds, revenue and thought that he could make a small profit while retaining the income and spending less - and/or owning it for a few years and selling it on for a profit. Which is where he's come unstuck, because he had no wider understanding or knowledge of the football club. He clearly doesn't want to compete in the way the other big clubs do, and we are a big club, aren't we ? would you care to tell us how we should compete with the big clubs ? eerrr.......by buying players that help us to qualify regularly for europe like they do ? this, and when compared to relegation, this costs nothing.

You mean, you aint got a ( Ashley) leg to stand on. to quote you,.......

i wasnt counting, Ashley was getting plenty of support on here, during the January window. Youre an apologist for the rats deserting a sinking ship.

Correct.

Its March, do you count January as in the last few months?

Its sad that people argued with me so vigorously in support of Ashley, and now deny they even existed. Guess its to be expected, considering they were proved so wrong.

they know who they are, they're staying well clear of this. me still thinks thou dost protest too much.

methinks thou dost protest too much. Me thinks though doth exaggerate to much At least Dave was man enough.

methinks thou dost protest too much.

of course, you want to disassociate yourselves with supporting Ashley now,...lol

Yes really.

why would you get banned ? I don't know what his major intention was, what do you think it was ? I'm GUESSING that he didn't understand football too much, looked at our crowds, revenue and thought that he could make a small profit while retaining the income and spending less - and/or owning it for a few years and selling it on for a profit. Which is where he's come unstuck, because he had no wider understanding or knowledge of the football club. He clearly doesn't want to compete in the way the other big clubs do, and we are a big club, aren't we ? would you care to tell us how we should compete with the big clubs ? we should compete with big clubs, by getting in a manager, whos seasons would finish, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 2nd, 2nd,,,,,,,,i wonder who that would be?

I remember a few months ago , this place being rammed with Ashley apologists. Do these people still believe , in his system, and management structure, or shall i order a HUGE HUMBLE pie, for these sad individuals,,,,,,, I know who you are.

you could end up eating your words.

FYP

And I'll do my Robert Huth on Shearer impression if you do. Walk around looking like a big ugly German?

FFS

Waiting to see how you'll spin this into KK's fault. KKs spending would have been a very profitable investment, compared with what has transpired.

I rekon Ashley would back a dead horse these days.

appointing Keegan, then Wise to oversee him made no sense. If ashley had backed Keegan, with 30 million, it would have paid for itself, relative to where we are now, and what ashley has lost.

Deliberate, attention grabbing headline. Whore. Yes, but this story will run, and if theres an ounce of truthg in it, its the biggest thing that could happen to the club,...worthy of its own thread.