Aye, I hate that too. It also irks me when the "experts" come out with guff like "it can't have been a penalty/free kick because the attackers didn't appeal" or "it must have been a penalty/free kick because the defenders didn't argue" - it's not cricket, you don't have to appeal, and you might get booked if the ref disagrees in the first case, and you should get booked if you argue in the second one. They're just cliche-parroting dimwits.