1964

It's a sick joke surely

And to be honest whilst that has been touted as mitigation it's irrelevant according to the laws of the game. The ball could have been in our half, but if their keeper does that it's still a pen to us

The angle that the ref has is the clearest one, he is looking at it and fraser nearly lands on his head. I don't agree with this conspiracy that refs have been briefed against Newcastle, they would have to leave Michael Oliver out of that and hope that none of the other refs leaked it, its pretty ridiculous I think its just rank incompetence with perhaps personal bias against the Saudis and for the top 6

I didn't think the alexander-arnold was a foul, but the Leicester pen, liverpool head injury and todays were absolute shockers

VAR has just turned into another shit ref, it does not challenge decisions just confirms shite ones

Is longstaff 9ff to fight in the American civil war. That tache man!

When you see it from the refs angle its an even clearer pen

So is this fucker fit then?

Is that to the tune of 'moves like jagger'? ?

Any news on his fitness after he hobbled off?

I think yesterday's game showed that we need a defensive midfielder, the Shelvey/Willock partnership isn't mobile enough, has little defensive ability and Leicester took advantage of that. Hayden isn't great but he protects the back 4 better than those two

It happened to my missus when there wasn't enough 'stuff' on the swab for analysis. So it hadn't been howked far enough up the nose before she sent it off. Can't believe that would be the case here tho, you'd think it was done by someone medical

We have carried a threat but listening to manmanaman is torture, the fucking whining cunt

What time do we think their penalty will be?

At least 3-0 but could be a lot more

Nah I can't either to be honest, as you say it might ge moved back

I suspect the latter

With a covid outbreak, fucking hell that's cruel

It says vaccinated contacts are better protected i.e. those who you come into contact with, not those vaccinated

What is this feeling based on? Clearly not the empirical, peer-reviewed evidence that shows that you are incorrect

From the Lancet, however this may have been disproved by some guy in his garage on YouTube To address the primary study outcome to establish the secondary attack rates (SARs) in household contacts, the vaccination statuses for 232 contacts exposed to 162 epidemiologically linked delta-variant-infected index cases were analysed. The SARs in household contacts exposed to the delta variant was 25% in vaccinated and 38% in unvaccinated contacts. These results underpin the key message that vaccinated contacts are better protected than the unvaccinated

You either align yourself with science and scientists like Jonathan Van Tam and expert epidemiologists like Chris Whitty, or you take the side or Right Said Fred and people off TOWIE The notion that they are part of a global conspiracy is beyond stupid and the denial of science is indicative of the state of the planet. The fact that the number of flat-earthers is increasing just bends my head.

Doing what you want, when that impacts others is selfish isn't it?

No but they are potentially depriving their family of a close relative if they die, their employers who have paid their wages a valuable employee for a long period and the supporters of seeing their strongest team on the field for important matches Because all of a sudden they know more than scientists, who have kept them alive thus far but have all gone rogue, and are able to do research themselves based on the findings of Billy Bob Moonshine from Arkansas, who despite having a dial up modem is a genius

Isn't that just one of the shops?