Jump to content

1964

Member
  • Posts

    3,855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1964

  1. 1964

    Sunderland

    Imagine being in a division where its decided it's not that important to finish and we'll just decide league position using maths Like playing out with your mates and being shouted in for your tea so you play next goal wins
  2. Political point scoring and taking the faux moral high ground. Politicians bread and butter that mate
  3. Do yourself a favour mate and go back to lurking, there's some mad buggers on here
  4. So if this bid is knocked back does he think we can just dive straight into another bid and ignore any appeal? I doubt we could
  5. That's definitely Miguel Delaney, the journalist, because he can't spell pen
  6. Has this even made sky sports news? It doesn't seem to be getting mention
  7. Up till now the rest of the world could not give a monkeys btw. Living on merseyside I have had a few lads ask what is going on but largely it's irrelevant. It will kick off a bit but nowhere near the levels of hysteria seen on here. Or the insane world of Twitter
  8. 1964

    Transfer rumours

    Immobile already plays for us
  9. Plus if his employers decide he has overstepped the mark and sack him fair enough but to actually lobby for him to lose his job is beyond pathetic
  10. 1964

    Sunderland

    The guy in many of the social media pictures of this weekends London right wing riots was a sunderland native, of course. He was wearing lime green tiny shorts and a bikini top, had pissed himself and was standing next to a Britain First flag, upon which they had misspelled Britain deciding to call it 'Britian' Imagine if he was from Newcastle
  11. So will we only find out if there is any appeal if it idnt published? They wouldn't just say there is an appeal?
  12. Which would be a way of burying the report and therefore negating the appeal . So why haven't they?
  13. Because the WTO Court of Arbitration isn’t quorate therefore there’s no one to hear an appeal. That doesn't mean they cant lodge one though surely..... does it? Just because the machinery isnt there shouldn't prevent a lawful appeal, it just can't be heard
  14. So if they thought it was a risk why haven't they already appealed? My head hurts
  15. Fucking hell let's just stick with cuntface A conundrum wrapped in an enigma, and we are wondering why it's taken so long
  16. Sorry to keep labouring this but PIF cant appeal because it isnt against them is it? They declared independence in this so they wont in theory see the report
  17. But as the FA dont need legal justification they can use it anyway. PIF can sue the WTO if they lose, the FA can just say they took it on face value
  18. Back on topic and whilst this has probably been answered amongst the maelstrom of preceding shite that I cant be arsed reading but...... Why do people think the WTO report is going to trigger premier league support? I've read that approval will be after it is published but I would have thought that it would be more likely to be the trigger to reject the Saudis if it states unequivocally that there is a link between them and beoutq. Like a cloak to hide behind and justify rejection.
  19. There is probably some GDPR element in that if its recorded and they were aware that they are being recorded she has the right for it to be erased. And a possible Subject Access Request for this to be made available to her. *the above could all be bollocks
  20. He's got a fucking nerve, no communication about season tickets whilst asking for clarity from the FA
  21. Is it not going to be difficult for PIF to say they are separate from the Saudi regime but can still do something about piracy in the region? If they can then they are clearly the same entity
×
×
  • Create New...