sbnufc

How that Almiron foul wasn't given, right in front of the linesman, is beyond me. Watching that back now, even slowing it down to 0.5x I can't see a foul at all tbf. Raul touches Almiron's back and he collapses like a deck of cards. He had the chance to just hoof it

Going by memory, as I haven't had the luxury of rewatching it afterwards. It felt like the ball had gone outside the box before it got to Traore (?) in that photo posted above. Could be wrong. Yeah, before 94:30.. Their attack is still very much alive and well at that point. Even if it was after the extra 30 seconds, no ref is gonna blow for FT then

Was literally just after them, actually.. which just added to my bemusement

fwiw just watching it back, 94:06 Ritchie hoofs it up to half way, Rondon misses it. Wolves hoof it back to our box 94:11 and it stays within 18 yards of our goal line until the goal. Dunno where this "pinged well near the touchline when he should've blown -- around 4-7 seconds before the goal" is

We made a sub in time-on, which is an automatic 30 second addition. You could see the ref look at his watch in the 94th minute (the commentators mentioned it) and think "one more phase" - perhaps that decision is questionable but the refs union would agree 100% with that decision. The goal went in at 94.37 didn't it? 7 seconds "over". Whether it's a foul or not, whether Almiron was fouled or not, whether Moutinho should have been on the pitch - these are all different questions. But I don't think we can quibble with the time-on. One more phase ? As much as I want rugby style officiating in football that's too much. A ref isn't going to blow the final whistle when one team is almost in the other team's box like No. Nobody expects them to. It's the previous ball that was defended and pinged well near the touchline when he should've blown -- around 4-7 seconds before the goal came. This is when a normal human would expect the final whistle to go, as the last "attack" had come to nothing, and we were already over the allotted time. This. They had what should have been their last attack and it was cleared. He then gave them another one and they scored. You're wrong, like. As said, 30 seconds added is standard for an extra sub. So 94:30. As also said, the ref isn't gonna blow right as the other team are about to attack/put the ball in the box. Here's play at 94:30 - A lot of complaints can be had about the goal. The time isn't one of them.

Not sure which countries commentary I had on last night, but the main commentator said when Almiron came on that Ashley has "gone up in their (Newcastle fans) estimations after this signing" These cunts are so out of touch

Looking forward to the £5 stream that won't work

From what I read they have big demand, 2,500 waiting list for season tickets currenty

https://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2019/feb/12/david-squires-on-chelsea-maurizio-sarri-humiliation-manchester-city

He's been there 6 years ffs

Eh? Son kicked the ball too hard. Should have been sent off for endangering opponents

Overturns 67% or something like that in Spain (or Italy.. can't remember tbh I posted it in the VAR topic the other day) edit Ligue 1, in fact

0.

Gets worse with every different angle I see

Rafa knows Dubravka fucked up. Rafa hasn't seen a proper replay

what a cock. how's this cunt still posting here ffs?

In real time you can miss things. 2 hands coming over your face even for half a second (ie, "in real time") is more than enough to stop you catching a ball like that. Real time or still, it's a foul, man.

Carragher still saying it's not a foul

fucking refs man

how the fuck is that not a foul?

Draw or win. We won't lose.

Not very, they'll just go up next season. They're still the biggest club in the league by a mile