Groundhog63

Works the other way to. For eg, Stanley Johnson was/is a bit "handsy" with his wife. Son, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel, has a track record of similar, even with his current. Charles was shagging his married mistress before and all through his marriage. Son William has followed that path. Learnt behaviour ?

No season ticket Not a member Been to one home cup game = Haven't got a POT to piss in. ?

Not sticking up for her father BUT did he not say in that statement that SHE didn't want it released & was devastated it had been? I'm a dad but, thankfully, not to daughters. I'd be panicking every time she left the house. Either way, when they're adults, you can't pick their partners just a) advise and b) be there for them when it goes Pete Tong Unless you "know someone" of course. Then you get them kneecapped.

This.

Hypothetically he could've driven the car from the Hilton underground car park to the front door for his gf to then drive on public highways.....er......

Tbf it does rhyme with "Paedo" "Giro" & "I shag me sister and so does me bro"

Talking of Shields and music, I see that Shak has been outed as a Gooner ?

Got the CD ?????

The law's a frustrating process both in its working and, for the "hang em" brigade, quite often with its outcomes. Perhaps deliberately so. I follow a few experts. Azfal being one. Read all, so far, The Secret Barrister books.(*) When you take the emotional/morality aspect away from any case and focus, purely, on the law it's more easily understood. * fully fledged Internet barrister me like. Just for the wig ?

This

Foggy has a hotline to Ten Hag on speed dial, lads. Fair doos.

In relation to Greenwood, rather than Castore, isn't it the case that he's innocent. Was going to quotation the "innocent" but, in the eyes of the law he is. Unfortunately. Don't mean to go all Azfal in the search for likes from Neville but he's innocent, now, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW. Likewise, the CPS not progressing the case doesn't mean he's NOT GUILTY of the offence. Just they deem it unlikely they could prove otherwise. The former but would mean, legally, he's entitled to his wedge. Notwithstanding "Disrepute" fault.

No it wasn't. The interview was the icing on the cake. He was toast anyway.

That's more accurate than Youtube's auto. All over the gaff, that. Like the bit in bold. Means business. Plus he's got a coffee machine and has nee idea how it grafts

Go on settings Select Subtitles Select Auto translate Select English Thank me later

Correct, as we all know Man United fans mainly live in London, Dublin and Asia

Chelsea 2 v 2 Fulham Everton 0 v 2 Arsenal Villa 1 v 2 Leicester Brentford 3 v 1 Southampton Brighton 3 v 0 Bournemouth Man United 3 v 1 Palace Wolves 0 v 1 Liverpool Newcastle 1 v 0 West Ham Forest 1 v 1 Leeds Spurs 1 v 1 Man City Man United 2 v 1 Leeds

Own goal in the 98th minute. Schar free kick wickedly deflected off of shit Bruno's hidious whiney bracket. Leaving the snidey, buck toothed, scruff in a coma

Let's go full blown positive and find ourselves, on the day of the final, coming off the back of an unbeaten, 7 points from 3 games, run. W, W, D I mean, it's probably a long shot but not impossible. If that's the case I'd assume Eddie wouldn't just bring Bruno straight back in, or would he? Hypotheticals

Shit Bruno's a cheating little cunt mind

If he's brilliant at it we should recall him for Saturday ??

Anyone mentioned Lingard injured himself in the warm up ? Aye, reeto

Koul starting for Hearts at home to Rangers. Currently 0-1

Cancel the skiing trip Get a ticket Get so pissed in Covent Garden the night before that I can't be bothered with the match Go down to Trafalgar Square and shit in the pool then dive off the fountain, smashing me bracket in the process