Kid Icarus

I have, that's how I came to that conclusion We disagree, it's fine.

Compared to Howe they have. Agree to disagree though, We're speaking different languages here.

If you genuinely believe that the amount and depth of criticism for PIF has been anywhere near that for Howe then godspeed. I'd be shocked if many agreed.

that's class, I'll post that.

Well then now you see why I said it was pure gaslighting.

Eales illness pre-dated last summer's window by almost a year. You need a CEO and DoF in place for the transfer window. By all accounts, no one below executive level knew Mitchell was leaving until he did. Both the CEO and DoF situations were a complete shitshow.

Like I say, the amount and depth of criticism for PIF compared to that for Howe is night and day. I'm not saying Howe should be absolved of all blame, I'm saying that the blame is focused almost exclusively on him.

The difference between the criticism aimed at them vs aimed at Howe is night and day and we both know that. The amount of people who seem to have memory-holed last summer into one where PIF backed Howe and the summer was all Howe's fault is unbelievable.

You've demonstrated perfectly how they continue to get away with it, because that's not what happened at all.

That's right, you're only here straight after a defeat to act the tit and give your loyalty to the club* *Our CEO and owners. I've quoted you before, a few times. Here's the general gist.

They haven't, this is pure gaslighting like.

I've posted specifically to you about this a few times and you never reply. At this point you're surely taking the piss, howeh.

It doesn't need to be a change of ownership, pointing the finger them at all for their part in this would be a start. They've got away scot free despite being most to blame imo. The manager's performance can be scrutinised to death, of course it can, but I find it crazy how much they're just bypassed and Howe bears the full brunt.

Anywhere near to the extent Howe has? Absolutely no chance, and they're much more to blame. Your second sentence says it all about the crazy position you're putting forward. Howe should go, but you don't trust the club to replace him well, sounds like a mental proposition to me.

Are PIF being scrutinised anywhere near to the extent Howe is for their part in this season?

He's uniquely the only reason anyone wants to question or discuss, that's why it's different.

Get a grip man. Everyone hates plastics, it's not remotely controversial.

Questioning whether he will and wanting him to are completely different things. I've already said based on Hopkinson's interview that I think he'll go, that doesn't mean I think the decision in itself isn't mental though.

The result doesn't dictate game control. I take the point about losing points overall over the season - something that we've all blamed fatigue and game schedule for. I don't think that applies today like, that pen decision was a joke.

There is, plastics are shit and you know it.

If only I had the ambition to randomly 'support' a club thousands of miles away.

I think there are tbh. There have been times when successful managers have been given a long rope with the supporter base. We've had sections questioning him specifically from the start of the season. I dont think we're the only ones like this at all, Villa are like this with Emery for example.

There is, plastics are the scourge of modern football.

Where did I set up that premise like? The entirety of the Eddie Howe out portion of our fanbase have come to the conclusion that he is the thing that needs to change. I think that's mental for reasons I've made time and again.

Yes and there are far more and bigger reasons for that than just Eddie Howe.