Adam P
Member-
Posts
377 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Adam P
-
The thing that blows my mind the most about this episode is how many people have bought into the evidence free narrative that Isak ‘downed tools’. It’s such a shit cliche anyway but it’s actually highly offensive to Eddie Howe. i have said this before and was roundly ignored but there is 0% chance that the decision to not bring Isak on tour and let him train in Northern Spain was not 100% Eddie Howe’s. It may have been desired by Isak and his entourage, we have no ideas of that. One thing is certain is that Eddie would not allow any player to undermine his authority. It’s such a shit, unrealistic take that lends from tool workers in factories not elite high performance management. As fucking if it wasn’t Eddie’s decision.
-
Been my theory from the start that the Ekitike bid was part of our ‘Isak’ strategy. My view on our strategy this summer is that we have been on the defensive from the outset, knew what to expect and from who. Selling Isak for 130m plus and replacing him with an 80m plus player is good business but it doesn’t really make a huge dint in our PSR thresholds, especially with sell on for Sociedad and add ons for incomer.
-
Definitely sounds made up to me, as if KFC in Manchester has all those different fans working there.
-
Still about the same, we now know there were crisis meetings in March about keeping hold of Isak and that there were strategies put in place. Now that information doesnt come close to confirming a proactive strategy of chasing Liverpool's no.2 target to make them move for that target, but its definitely consistent. It remains a good strategy to keep ypur best player who could earn more elsewhere. We now know the concerns around keeping him go way back. None of this proves anything. Even the weakness in the theory that Ekitike was nott Liverpool's 'second' choice but was in fact part of a fooballing strategy to get both Ekitike and Isak doesnt undermine the strategic value of prompting a bid for Ekitike. If Isak leaves for Liverpool you would have to say that strategisiing around Liverpool's intentions in March probably wouldnt have led to the view that Liverpool would pursue both (obvioulsy Jota impacted this too). I do corporate strategy for a company over 50 times larger than Man City so maybe i am over thinking it.
-
Fully agrree, he is the glue that holds us together. Incredible leader.
-
Thats one perspective. Another one is that its better for Isak to be in the same time zone as the commercial and operational team as contract negotiations are ongoing (with us and others obviously). Another perspective could be that he feels Isak needs time to think and understands he needs to make an important career decision, the injury needs some rest and the combination of factors means an exhausinting long trip to the far east is not good for him. Another perspective might be that some isolation works well both ways, given the Isak story is probably the biggest one in world club football, our players dont need the distraction. There's a whole range of unknown factors and Eddie has taken them all into account and decided on what he thinks is best for the club. No way in the world he would let an agent / player dictate to him on club matters.
-
Our manager is an extremely strong leader, the decision on whether Isak went to Asia was his and his alone. The idea that Isak would refuse to travel when Eddie wanted him too is just absurd and stupid. The reasons may have been emanating from the Isak's agent but the decision was Eddie's. Injury, looking for another club, whatever reasons you want to put in there are all the considerations but the decison-maker on everything related to our first team is Eddie.