mouldy_uk Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 Can someone explain why in this high profile recent case regarding sexual assault (see - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/8093490.stm) the woman has been named (even though she has only been 'charged'). But, in the case of Baby P the culprits identities were kept anonymous? I genuinely don't understand it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now