Jump to content

PLEASE ALL READ: Fixture lists


Dave

Recommended Posts

It's that time of year again; the fixtures are released tomorrow for the upcoming 2009/10 season.

 

A few people have wondered whether the fixtures are still prohibited now we're not in the Premier League, and I guess you've realised by now what the answer is.

 

Football League fixtures are copyrighted by Football DataCo just like those for the Premier League, and as such are strictly forbidden from being posted on the forum - this includes all workarounds, such as using alternate names etc. Don't moan at us, they just are.

 

Please co-operate with us on this issue; we don't like it but can't risk the copyright holders threatening our hosts - this would in all likelihood see the site being pulled at least temporarily. This has happened before to internet sites and will happen again. Purchasing rights to publish the fixtures is complicated and would use up essential server funds - personally I feel it's totally unnecessary when there are plenty of places where the fixtures can be seen legally anyway (NUFC.com, .cock, BBC etc).

 

To avoid confusion, there is no permitted amount of fixtures but you may discuss individual fixtures that are not arranged in a list format. For example, posting about our opening fixture or our run-in is fine provided there's no actual list. Again; stupid rules but we don't make them.

 

To summarise, nothing has changed from last season. Bans will be used if people take the piss.

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's sad, but i'm looking forward to tommorow somewhat. :lol:

 

Why's that sad? Me too. A new season is a new season.

 

I just think I should have better things to look forward to than that. Holiday in 8 days. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

fingers crossed for the first away game of the season being somewhere relatively close that also can offer a big allocation.  Sheff Wed or Barnsley or something.

 

Aye, Sheff Wed would be smashing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a joke.  You can't copyright knowledge!  The primary theme of Dahmus’s analysis of submaterialist narrative is the role of the observer as participant. Marx uses the term ‘the capitalist paradigm of consensus’ to denote the common ground between reality and class. But the premise of the deconstructive paradigm of consensus states that reality is a product of communication.

 

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of neocultural truth. Derrida uses the term ‘conceptual deconstruction’ to denote the role of the reader as participant. In a sense, Prinn holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of consensus and semantic theory.

 

“Society is intrinsically dead,” says Marx. If the capitalist paradigm of consensus holds, the works of Spelling are modernistic. It could be said that Sartre uses the term ‘neotextual materialist theory’ to denote a postcapitalist reality.

 

The main theme of the works of Spelling is the difference between art and class. Several discourses concerning neotextual theory may be revealed. But Debord uses the term ‘the deconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote the role of the artist as observer.

 

The characteristic theme of von Ludwig’s model of the capitalist paradigm of consensus is the genre of cultural sexual identity. However, Foucault promotes the use of preconceptual theory to attack hierarchy.

 

The subject is interpolated into a capitalist paradigm of consensus that includes art as a totality. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term ‘neotextual theory’ to denote the common ground between society and sexual identity.

 

The subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a paradox. However, in Charmed, Spelling examines neotextual theory; in Robin’s Hoods he affirms the capitalist paradigm of consensus.

 

Marx uses the term ‘the deconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote the economy, and hence the defining characteristic, of neodialectic class. It could be said that neotextual theory suggests that culture is capable of significance.

 

Drucker holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of consensus and deconstructivist neocultural theory. In a sense, Lyotard suggests the use of the conceptualist paradigm of expression to modify and analyse sexual identity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a joke.  You can't copyright knowledge!  The primary theme of Dahmus’s analysis of submaterialist narrative is the role of the observer as participant. Marx uses the term ‘the capitalist paradigm of consensus’ to denote the common ground between reality and class. But the premise of the deconstructive paradigm of consensus states that reality is a product of communication.

 

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of neocultural truth. Derrida uses the term ‘conceptual deconstruction’ to denote the role of the reader as participant. In a sense, Prinn holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of consensus and semantic theory.

 

“Society is intrinsically dead,” says Marx. If the capitalist paradigm of consensus holds, the works of Spelling are modernistic. It could be said that Sartre uses the term ‘neotextual materialist theory’ to denote a postcapitalist reality.

 

The main theme of the works of Spelling is the difference between art and class. Several discourses concerning neotextual theory may be revealed. But Debord uses the term ‘the deconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote the role of the artist as observer.

 

The characteristic theme of von Ludwig’s model of the capitalist paradigm of consensus is the genre of cultural sexual identity. However, Foucault promotes the use of preconceptual theory to attack hierarchy.

 

The subject is interpolated into a capitalist paradigm of consensus that includes art as a totality. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term ‘neotextual theory’ to denote the common ground between society and sexual identity.

 

The subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a paradox. However, in Charmed, Spelling examines neotextual theory; in Robin’s Hoods he affirms the capitalist paradigm of consensus.

 

Marx uses the term ‘the deconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote the economy, and hence the defining characteristic, of neodialectic class. It could be said that neotextual theory suggests that culture is capable of significance.

 

Drucker holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of consensus and deconstructivist neocultural theory. In a sense, Lyotard suggests the use of the conceptualist paradigm of expression to modify and analyse sexual identity.

 

Well you can enjoy your day in court and pay the costs for that argument then but the site doesn't fancy funding something like that, it struggles to pay the server bill let alone court bills.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a joke.  You can't copyright knowledge!  The primary theme of Dahmus’s analysis of submaterialist narrative is the role of the observer as participant. Marx uses the term ‘the capitalist paradigm of consensus’ to denote the common ground between reality and class. But the premise of the deconstructive paradigm of consensus states that reality is a product of communication.

 

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of neocultural truth. Derrida uses the term ‘conceptual deconstruction’ to denote the role of the reader as participant. In a sense, Prinn holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of consensus and semantic theory.

 

“Society is intrinsically dead,” says Marx. If the capitalist paradigm of consensus holds, the works of Spelling are modernistic. It could be said that Sartre uses the term ‘neotextual materialist theory’ to denote a postcapitalist reality.

 

The main theme of the works of Spelling is the difference between art and class. Several discourses concerning neotextual theory may be revealed. But Debord uses the term ‘the deconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote the role of the artist as observer.

 

The characteristic theme of von Ludwig’s model of the capitalist paradigm of consensus is the genre of cultural sexual identity. However, Foucault promotes the use of preconceptual theory to attack hierarchy.

 

The subject is interpolated into a capitalist paradigm of consensus that includes art as a totality. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term ‘neotextual theory’ to denote the common ground between society and sexual identity.

 

The subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a paradox. However, in Charmed, Spelling examines neotextual theory; in Robin’s Hoods he affirms the capitalist paradigm of consensus.

 

Marx uses the term ‘the deconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote the economy, and hence the defining characteristic, of neodialectic class. It could be said that neotextual theory suggests that culture is capable of significance.

 

Drucker holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of consensus and deconstructivist neocultural theory. In a sense, Lyotard suggests the use of the conceptualist paradigm of expression to modify and analyse sexual identity.

 

Nice copy and paste.  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you can enjoy your day in court and pay the costs for that argument then but the site doesn't fancy funding something like that, it struggles to pay the server bill let alone court bills.

Wooooooosh.
Link to post
Share on other sites

How much does it cost to buy the publishing rights?

 

I get the feeling that Dave would be having a cut price Homer-and-Marge style wedding in a casino somewhere if he stumped up for the fixture rights, put it that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you can enjoy your day in court and pay the costs for that argument then but the site doesn't fancy funding something like that, it struggles to pay the server bill let alone court bills.

Wooooooosh.

 

Couldn't be arsed to read it to be honest :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep getting sent emails from Newcastle trying to get me excited about the fixtures coming out.

1. The owner is selling the club and is letting the club rot until he does.

2. We have no manager.

3. We have no plans.

4. We are in the Championship.

 

I'm struggling to get excited.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep getting sent emails from Newcastle trying to get me excited about the fixtures coming out.

1. The owner is selling the club and is letting the club rot until he does.

2. We have no manager.

3. We have no plans.

4. We are in the Championship.

 

I'm struggling to get excited.

 

Try this:

 

http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/6359/laurentrobert.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep getting sent emails from Newcastle trying to get me excited about the fixtures coming out.

1. The owner is selling the club and is letting the club rot until he does.

2. We have no manager.

3. We have no plans.

4. We are in the Championship.

 

I'm struggling to get excited.

 

Try this:

 

http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/6359/laurentrobert.jpg

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep getting sent emails from Newcastle trying to get me excited about the fixtures coming out.

1. The owner is selling the club and is letting the club rot until he does.

2. We have no manager.

3. We have no plans.

4. We are in the Championship.

 

I'm struggling to get excited.

 

Try this:

 

http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/6359/laurentrobert.jpg

Nope, that didn't do it. I'll go and have a look at the "lush lasses" or "MILF" thread.

 

To clarify my original post: - I'm struggling to get excited (not in a sexual way).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...