GM Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Clare Balding complaint over sexuality is upheld http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/49136000/jpg/_49136360_006536212-1.jpg Clare Balding The complaint related to a review of Balding's TV show, Britain By Bike Sports presenter Clare Balding's official complaint over an article in the Sunday Times that mocked her sexuality has been upheld. In July, she complained to the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) over AA Gill's review of her new TV show, in which he called her a "dyke on a bike". The paper defended its columnist on freedom of expression grounds. The PCC ruled that some of the words were used in a "demeaning and gratuitous way". The newspaper defended Gill by saying he was well-known for his acerbic and sometimes tasteless sense of humour. 'Open society ' Balding took exception to Gill's review of her show, Britain By Bike, claiming his comments were irrelevant to the programme. In a statement released after the judgement, Balding said she was "delighted" with the verdict. "It was important for me and, crucially, for millions of other people quietly going about their work, to make the point that we deserve to be judged on our ability to do our jobs and not on the basis of our race, religion, gender or, in this case, sexual orientation. "I would like to thank all those who offered their support via e-mail, letter and Twitter - they gave me the strength to stand up and be counted. "I hope that this decision shows we are moving on from the days when derogatory comments about a person's sexuality were regarded as clever or funny." The newspaper argued the term "dyke" had been reclaimed by various groups as an empowering, not an offensive, term. The paper also drew attention to two organisations, which are both called Dykes on Bikes. The groups represent an American lesbian motorcycling movement and a UK-based cycling movement, whose members had reclaimed the word "dyke". It argued that an individual's sexuality should not give them an "all-encompassing protected status". A spokesman for the newspaper declined to comment further. However, the full PCC judgement must be published in the newspaper at the weekend. The PCC ruled that the use of the word "dyke" in the article - whatever its intention - was a "pejorative synonym relating to the complainant's sexuality". The context was "not that the reviewer was seeking positively to 'reclaim' the term, but rather to use it to refer to the complainant's sexuality in a demeaning and gratuitous way". As such, it represented a breach of the Code. Stephen Abell, director of the PCC, said: "Freedom of expression is a key part of an open society and something which the Commission has defended robustly in the past. "While the commentator is clearly entitled to his opinion about both the programme and the complainant, there are restraints placed upon him by the terms of the Editors' Code." It said the clause was "very clear that newspapers must avoid prejudicial, pejorative or irrelevant reference to an individual's sexual orientation and the reference to Balding plainly breached its terms". Balding told the PCC that she was not demanding special treatment, but just wanted to be treated the same as everybody else. The presenter has also asked for the newspaper to apologise. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11333484 Perhaps she'd have preferred to be called a carpet-muncher? A lavender menace? Or a Twatasaurus Rex? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Regardless of her sexuality, how does someone so ugly with an equally unappealing voice get work on tv? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Regardless of her sexuality, how does someone so ugly with an equally unappealing voice get work on tv? Its the BBC Quota for equal opportunities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 I'd buck her like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Regardless of her sexuality, how does someone so ugly with an equally unappealing voice get work on tv? Because the BBC bosses all know that her cunning lingers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 So we're all agreed that humiliating people because of their sexuality is all well and good, yeah? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 We have a woman at work that comes in on a mopead we call dyke on a bike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 I'd buck her like Well, unless you're a woman, she'd not buck you... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Someone should sue her for having a full head of hair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northerngimp Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Pat Butchers daughter has done well for herself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 18, 2010 Share Posted September 18, 2010 Regardless of her sexuality, how does someone so ugly with an equally unappealing voice get work on tv? i'm always more concerned about what is said rather than the looks of who said it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 it was cheap & lazy journalism - AA Gill is stuck up prat who seems to have graduated from restaurant critic to the main stream press for no discernible reason Balding is another typical BBC presenter - they get in and then they never seem to be moved out - see Sarah Cox, the mad woman athletics commentator, Lauro, and half of Radio 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now