Jump to content

PIF and RB Sports & Media - Darren Eales to step down from CEO after being diagnosed with blood cancer.


Yorkie

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Whitley mag said:

I find it hard to believe this guy isn’t just a front for the state, if you look at his net worth he can’t afford Man U. This is just a way to get the deal through to avoid complications with PSG ownership.

Of course he's a front for the state - he is a member of their Royal Family - it is ludicrous for anyone to say otherwise.  However, watch this sale get swiftly approved by the PL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Whitley mag said:

Not a bad thing for us if the Qatari’s by the mancs, you’ll find quite a few high profile football commentators come down off their moral high horse if this goes through.
 

Also whilst the Qatari’s have been the most corrupt fuckers in world football, I don’t think it’s a bad thing to lessen the yank influence on the league. 
 

 

Oh don't worry, there'll be no chance of that. Gary Neville et al will just say that "it's important that we have the conversation" at that'll be that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Who wants to let Tariq know that there is nothing in the PL rules about clubs being owned by a state …

True but wouldn't it mean bin Salman would have to pass the owners and directors thing ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, madras said:

True but wouldn't it mean bin Salman would have to pass the owners and directors thing ?

Yes - and while the test does allow for failing the test if you’d have been convicted elsewhere, ultimately it was about piracy.   They prove MBS is the state, the state backed BeOUTQ, MBS therefore involved in piracy, which would have led to conviction in the UK (though of course he’d never have been convicted in KSA).  It was a convoluted way to hammer them on piracy.

 

There is zero chance that the PL starts an international diplomacy issue otherwise - they knew that PIF would never allow MBS to be ‘convicted’ of piracy by the PL.  They would have also known that the PL was unlikely to pin the murder of Khashoggi, or multiple violations of international law, or state-sponsored oppression of minority groups etc.  The PL’s only sense of morality or ethics applies to its own interests. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Agreed.  A Man Utd unencumbered by the Glaziers’ ludicrous leveraged debt repayments will be an even bigger monster.  It’s a massive club with huge revenue streams already - it doesn’t need a boost.  Though I’d expect the Qataris will likely rebuild the ground and training facilities.

 

Ultimately, they’re the biggest club in the country and likely always will be.  A properly run Man Utd isn’t fannying around in 3rd/4th/5th year on year. 

Those leveraged debt payments didn't stop them splashing out on Pogba, Maguire, Ronaldo...

 

Whoever takes over Man Utd will spend lots of money. How rich they are doesn't worry me, it's how well-run they end up being, that's what will make the difference. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RodneyCisse said:

Anyone got Oliver Holts objection to the bid from the Qataris… Or does that not suit the agenda in his paper?

 

It was nice to Miguel Delaney having a pop, despite supporting them.

 

Adam Crofton on the other hand, yikes.

 

 

Edited by The Prophet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bizarre to say the least, extremely unfair on Howe to be put in that sort of position. I understand that they want someone with a position of influence to do something but that’s not Howe’s responsibility, he’s a football manager and it’s pretty disgraceful to put something like that on him 

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, reefatoon said:

Media stirring the pot with a final coming up. Some people seem intent on us not succeeding more than anything else.

Maybe they’re intent on publicising the story of the man facing torture and execution? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
14 minutes ago, Hovagod said:

Maybe they’re intent on publicising the story of the man facing torture and execution? 


If he is intent, then I will be interested to see all his other pieces on it then. Not just the part about some people trying to take a letter to Eddie Howe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole story is utterly horrific, I read it on the AI website a few days ago:

 

https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde23/6441/2023/en/

 

I’m not convinced that Howe is the appropriate target for the letter mind, though I’ve obviously no issue with anyone trying to highlight the case - it almost feels cowardly to target Howe though; if anyone at the club should be the target of the letter then it’s the owners, not the manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Sam is bang on that the way a minority carry on is rancid, particularly on social media. But he's taken the behaviour of the minority and applied it to the entire fanbase, when in reality there's a broad church of opinions on the matter.

Yep, a handful of internet goons don’t represent all of us.

 

Though again, I’m struggling to take lectures in morality from a hack employed by *checks notes* a Russian oligarch and a Saudi Sultan.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 18/02/2023 at 10:04, The Prophet said:

 

 

I find it hard to believe they are actual Newcastle fans tbh. If they were they would deliver the letter to Staveley or someone else in the hierarchy, no fan would pick Howe as the target for playing politics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...