Jump to content

PIF, PCP, and RB Sports & Media


Yorkie

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, xLiaaamx said:

This takeover is just ending up being the pits so far like. All the good stuff is words, everything that happens is actually canny shit. [emoji38]

 

:lol: Its been like 9 days, man. Its the pits now because it was the pits before. We're just seeing it all now. You dont undo all that damage in a working week. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

 

:lol: Its been like 9 days, man. Its the pits now because it was the pits before. We're just seeing it all now. You dont undo all that damage in a working week. 

 

Remember when rangers fans warned about the untold damage that Ashley has done to our club when it eventually gets out.

 

Them warnings are very likely still real, and disastrous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dokko said:

 

Bruce still here

No hint of replacements being interviewed 

No hint of the dof setup getting off the ground.

Talk of slow mgt structure with no doa.

Other prem clubs trying to stop sponsorship

Players fighting 

Lack of training days 

 

All of the internal stuff fucks off if you sack him day 1. It's the easiest decision they will ever have to make and yet he's still here. It was a gift wrapped open goal.

 

There's a lot of speculation in there. We have absolutely no idea where the consortium are in the recruitment process for manager or DoF/sporting director.

 

There isn't a lot the consortium can do about the actions of the other Premier League clubs either.

 

A lot of the other problems you listed come back to the management, not the ownership, but I agree they could be resolved by binning Bruce, which they need to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I'm right in thinking this only affects monies brought in that are applicable to FFP spend on players? Essentially, we have to find some way of getting money into the club, solely to balance out spend on players. We can spend what we like on everything outside of the playing staff, so the improvements to the ground, training facilities and wages of a new manager aren't included?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ben said:

Rumours it was West Ham that called for the vote


Good because if they keep pushing, the anti-competition legal team will have an absolute field day. The fact they had a meeting without NUFC in attendance is a blatant example of this. Premier League as we all know is corrupt, but they and their members are still subject to UK law. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There’s no way any of that sticks. It’s anti competitive and wouldn’t get through court. Like mentioned before, if they were really worried about it they wouldn’t have sent Charnley.

 

The other clubs seem to be trying to act quickly before our new owners have a grasp of what’s going on.

 

We need a beast of a CEO in quickly, someone who knows this lot and will put manners on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NE27 said:

 

Remember when rangers fans warned about the untold damage that Ashley has done to our club when it eventually gets out.

 

Them warnings are very likely still real, and disastrous.

 

Difference is we can afford to buy ourselves out of them

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Armchair Pundit said:

So, I'm right in thinking this only affects monies brought in that are applicable to FFP spend on players? Essentially, we have to find some way of getting money into the club, solely to balance out spend on players. We can spend what we like on everything outside of the playing staff, so the improvements to the ground, training facilities and wages of a new manager aren't included?

Yup. And right now we can spend £190m on players coz Ashley was so tight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've seen how good the PL are at kicking cans down the road when they don't want something. The other clubs know they can stall us for years and increase the gap to us further while we have legally clear our right to compete again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, geordie_b said:

 

Difference is we can afford to buy ourselves out of them

 

Long term definitely. I was just meaning in relation to how slow the consortium are moving re appointments.

 

Club has little to no staff, nobody of any note in any position. 

 

And we are taking a dicking from all corners so I'm not surprised they are stuttering a little bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, geordie_b said:
7 minutes ago, NE27 said:

 

Remember when rangers fans warned about the untold damage that Ashley has done to our club when it eventually gets out.

 

Them warnings are very likely still real, and disastrous.

 

Difference is we can afford to buy ourselves out of them

 

Thats not always possible, or even the best idea. It also would go against what theyve claimed their MO will be. Sometimes spending time s better than spending money. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, et tu brute said:


Good because if they keep pushing, the anti-competition legal team will have an absolute field day. The fact they had a meeting without NUFC in attendance is a blatant example of this. Premier League as we all know is corrupt, but they and their members are still subject to UK law. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said:

There’s no way any of that sticks. It’s anti competitive and wouldn’t get through court. Like mentioned before, if they were really worried about it they wouldn’t have sent Charnley.

 

The other clubs seem to be trying to act quickly before our new owners have a grasp of what’s going on.

 

We need a beast of a CEO in quickly, someone who knows this lot and will put manners on them.


Think they had no choice but to send Charnley as the Companies House standings have not been updated yet, so legally I think he is probably still the only legal Director until it is updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LV said:

Not sacking Bruce aside they’ve done nothing else wrong.

 

Its gonna take a bit of time to get the right building blocks in place but it’ll come. 

You would have thought though they'd have had all the pieces in place - they had the best part of 18 months to plan.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a lovely picture of Brady's daughter in the papers recently sunning herself in Arab sunshine, showing off all the bling.

Not a f**k given about human rights when it came to posing for instagram or getting some sun on her arse.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Wolfcastle

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ManDoon said:

Nothing will happen with this, not worried at all. It’s retarded 

 

Aye, they haven't got a leg to stand on. I'd love it if we sued all 18 of them for millions. 

 

it's nowt more than them trying to frighten us. They will have to do a lot better than this. [emoji38]

 

 

Edited by Wandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...