et tu brute Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 39 minutes ago, Tiresias said: Staverley said from the start they wouldn't be here forever, though they seem to be having so much fun that i doubt they'll be off anytime soon, they can probably sell half their stake for as much as they put in at this point and retain seats on board etc. But as said that doesnt look super credible but wouldnt shock me to see Staverley sell some at some point Sge has already stated previously that their shares maybe diluted at some point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 4 hours ago, Stifler said: It’s a mess of an article. It talks as if they are wanting to raise capital, then talks as if they are wanting to invest themselves. Agreed, it’s complete and utter gibberish. Had to read it three times as I thought I was having comprehension issues before realising I was reading a ‘journalist’ who can’t get a three paragraph story making sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 (edited) Staveley actually hinted at this in her interview, instead of PIF buying other clubs outright they may go down another route. This isn’t about PCP diluting their stake though I agree it’s a poorly written article, this is about linking up and having an investment in multiple clubs without owning them outright. Edited March 18 by Whitley mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInfiniteOdyssey Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 I wonder if the club will use the international break as an opportunity to announce further commercial deals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 1 minute ago, TheInfiniteOdyssey said: I wonder if the club will use the international break as an opportunity to announce further commercial deals. I'm guessing they're either with the premier league approval point or the current deals block the announcement of then next one until a certain time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnbull2000 Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 The Premier League could still cripple our progress if they deny a significant increase in commercial income. Europe + only a marginally improved squad could send us back down mid-table to 8th-12th. We clearly have the potential to grow significantly and don't see why commercial sponsorship can't reflect that. Unfortunately the PL could have other ideas. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 3 hours ago, Turnbull2000 said: The Premier League could still cripple our progress if they deny a significant increase in commercial income. Europe + only a marginally improved squad could send us back down mid-table to 8th-12th. We clearly have the potential to grow significantly and don't see why commercial sponsorship can't reflect that. Unfortunately the PL could have other ideas. The PL FMV panel decisions and the entire concept of FMV is open to legal challenge. These twats need to be challenged. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 8 minutes ago, FloydianMag said: The PL FMV panel decisions and the entire concept of FMV is open to legal challenge. These twats need to be challenged. Yep, I agree - but the owners are playing nice, no doubt because the PL could also start playing hardball on other matters. It’s anti-competitive nonsense that other clubs can judge what is a reasonable amount for a club to earn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 8 hours ago, Turnbull2000 said: The Premier League could still cripple our progress if they deny a significant increase in commercial income. Europe + only a marginally improved squad could send us back down mid-table to 8th-12th. We clearly have the potential to grow significantly and don't see why commercial sponsorship can't reflect that. Unfortunately the PL could have other ideas. I wouldn’t worry about this too much. It’s basically to stop us taking the piss. Noon pay us more for the sleeve than fun88 do for the stadium and shirt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 5 minutes ago, 54 said: Newcastle documentary set to ask challenging questions Cameras have been following Newcastle United this season but do not expect an All Or Nothing-style series when the resulting documentary is released on Amazon Prime in the summer. A joint production between 72 Films and Lorton Entertainment, it is expected to be far punchier and harder-hitting than some of the behind-the-scenes football productions to date. Lorton Entertainment has also made a forthcoming Boris Becker documentary and Wagatha Christie film about the High Court trial involving Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy, while 72 Films has a series called Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story about the former BBC presenter and DJ, due out on Netflix in April. The Newcastle project will address the club’s commercial set-up rather than focus on the dressing room, and there is a desire to ask challenging questions — particularly about the relationship with majority owners PIF, Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elbee909 Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 Fair enough not pulling any punches re. the ownership. I'd love to see a behind the scenes docu about Amazon's corporate nature as well but won't hold my breath! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 I very much doubt that it'll actually be hard hitting like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 Of course it won’t be. I mean what’s in it for us (as a club) if we’re basically airing out our own dirty laundry? Im sure Staveley Co. would be ecstatic with bringing those non-footballing issues into focus and biting the hand that feeds us/them. The documentary makers will attempt to show some journalistic integrity but it’ll just be a bunch of prepared answers for known questions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cort Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 (edited) On 17/03/2023 at 16:03, Stifler said: I’m regards to UEFA possibly changing the ownership rules. I wonder what the wider context will be. Everyone is pointing at Qatar being able to buy Man Utd with out having that Qatari banker being the frontman. However it could also help Radcliffe, as he owns Nice and it’s not beyond possibility that they are in the same European competitions as Man Utd in future. Of course people will be looking at us and thinking it may mean our sister clubs might become bigger than the likes Dijion who are rumoured. Myself, I wonder if this will allow Red Bull to go again with their football group. They kind of hit a brick wall once Leipzig started getting into Europe and had to place one under their owners name and one under the beverages companies. I wonder if this means they will start looking at Serie A, La Liga, and Premier League clubs? I have always thought that Southampton would be a perfect fit for them. They have the right colour scheme, they have the academy that has produced quality players in the past, and yeah ok they can’t change their name etc under FA rules, but they could splash their brand all over them. It would also be interesting to see if bigger clubs start buying smaller clubs, especially Premier League clubs in order to help them with work visa’s etc. MK Dons are a better fit for them - sure they have to start at a lower level but they have done that before and it gives them time imprint the Red Bull philosophy with less pressure than doing it in the top 2 tiers. Plus they can do whatever to the branding, and no one would give a fuck. Edited March 20 by Cort Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 32 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: I very much doubt that it'll actually be hard hitting like. It's probably going to show Ashley up in a big way...can't wait. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 I'm not going to pretend to know exactly what that means but I guess it just puts them in a position of influence within a company that owns stakes in various clubs? So not the same as Man City buying up clubs outright. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 Quote US-based private equity firm 777 owns a portfolio containing stakes in several soccer clubs around the world. Having first acquired Italian club Genoa, it has since made investments in LaLiga outfit Sevilla, Brazilian team Vasco da Gama and Belgian top-flight side Standard Liège. Other clubs 777 co-owns includes France’s Red Star FC, and A-Leagues outfit Melbourne Victory, with its most recent purchase being a majority stake in Bundesliga club Hertha Berlin. I can see Liege being a target considering the success Brighton have seen with Union. Also its possible that Belgium overtakes France in Coefficient soon so more European football for those clubs on the horizon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 Introducing a Fan's advisory board https://www.nufc.co.uk/media/75368/nufc-fan-engagement-review-202223.pdf Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 Wowsers I hope that’s not what I think it could mean Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitude20 Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 6 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: I mean, I like that the funs are consulted for the club crest, but what’s with club name and home shirt colours? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 (edited) Don’t panic, it’s saying that they have moved these three items to become heritage assets which means they can not be changed without supporter consultation. Before now, they could make any changes they wanted to without fan involvement (in practice they still could but this is effectively a pinky promise) Edited March 22 by James Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 1 minute ago, James said: Don’t panic, it’s saying that they have moved these three items to become heritage assets which means they can not be changed without supporter consultation. So while it is horrendously worded, it's actually a good thing? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now