Jump to content

People blaming Parker for their 2nd...


Guest Knightrider
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Knightrider

It was Dyer's fault, he was marking Scholes and when the ball went wide, he followed the ball, despite there being two of our men there to try and deal with it. Once played back to Scholes he was free to aim and shoot, Dyer basically made up the mind of the Man Utd player on the ball (to pass to the unmarked Scholes) and Scholes himself (to shoot).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest JamesD

yea, but if dyer leaves scholes, it doesn't mean parker should rush over and triple team ronaldo and leave scholes wide open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest makemeacupoftea

Wasn't anyones fault really, just happens, Man utd are a class team and Paul Scholes always scores against us

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Gemmill

Bring back thread moderation ffs.  bluebigrazz.gif

 

Is this what the once great HTT has been reduced to.

 

Thread title:  People that think x.

 

Post content:  You're wrong.  It's clearly y.

 

tongue.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shut up, of course it was Parker's fault. It's Parker's fault we're in this position. In fact, it's Parker's fault we were beaten to the title in 96.

 

Well if Parker hadn't made that advert for Macdonalds back in 94 then one of our players wouldn't have seen it and hence the course of time would have been DRASTICALLY altered and we would have won the title.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Knightrider

Bring back thread moderation ffs.  bluebigrazz.gif

 

Is this what the once great HTT has been reduced to.

 

Thread title:  People that think x.

 

Post content:  You're wrong.  It's clearly y.

 

tongue.gif

 

Form is temporary, class is permanent.

 

I'll be back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest JamesD

All i'm saying is that for the second goal, it was very poor defending from parker and dyer, but parker was in more of a position to mark scholes. It reminded me of childrens football where the players just follow the ball around, which i noticed parker doing quite a few times this game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All i'm saying is that for the second goal, it was very poor defending from parker and dyer, but parker was in more of a position to mark scholes. It reminded me of childrens football where the players just follow the ball around, which i noticed parker doing quite a few times this game.

 

There was a lot of that, tbh, but I think that was mainly down to good movement from Man Utd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ball shouldn't have been able to drop at Ronaldo's feet in the first place. The cross from Park passed 3-4 Newcastle shirts that didn't even try and intercept. 3 players then were caught ball watching and left Scholes free in the centre. Bad defending for that goal overall on most players parts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not just credit Man Ure with some good use of the ball and good movemnt off it to create the chance. We cannot whinge on how they got to create the opening, if anything Roeder will be asking why there was no one breaking their neck  to get infront of Scholes when he received the ball, we all know he is a great striker of a football and there is always a risk of him banging it in if you stand off him.

Just seems there is a lot of Parker bashing goimg on at the moment on here, Parker did his job yesterday and kept Rooney out of the game for long periods of time.  :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not just credit Man Ure with some good use of the ball and good movemnt off it to create the chance. We cannot whinge on how they got to create the opening, if anything Roeder will be asking why there was no one breaking their neck  to get infront of Scholes when he received the ball, we all know he is a great striker of a football and there is always a risk of him banging it in if you stand off him.

Just seems there is a lot of Parker bashing goimg on at the moment on here, Parker did his job yesterday and kept Rooney out of the game for long periods of time.  :thup:

 

:thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alan Shearer 9

Bring back thread moderation ffs. bluebigrazz.gif

 

Is this what the once great HTT has been reduced to.

 

Thread title: People that think x.

 

Post content: You're wrong. It's clearly y.

 

tongue.gif

 

most knowledgable tbh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest *newcastle 4 life*

Why was the ball passed back to Shay in the 1st place?

 

Becasue Scott the magnificent thought "we've kicked off, Shay's got a groin problem, his kicking's been iffy all game, let's test him from the kick off."

 

God I'm glad we didn't get beaten last night. I too think that it was a poor decsion to pass back to Shay, but Parker was maginificent last night, for fuck's sake. Just as he invariably is. Christ knows what he's done to deserve this abuse. Obviously no one can remember having to watch Clarence Acuna.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why was the ball passed back to Shay in the 1st place?

 

Becasue Scott the magnificent thought "we've kicked off, Shay's got a groin problem, his kicking's been iffy all game, let's test him from the kick off."

 

God I'm glad we didn't get beaten last night. I too think that it was a poor decsion to pass back to Shay, but Parker was maginificent last night, for fuck's sake. Just as he invariably is. Christ knows what he's done to deserve this abuse. Obviously no one can remember having to watch Clarence Acuna.....

 

I liked Acuna tbh, good player who should have played more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why was the ball passed back to Shay in the 1st place?

 

Becasue Scott the magnificent thought "we've kicked off, Shay's got a groin problem, his kicking's been iffy all game, let's test him from the kick off."

 

God I'm glad we didn't get beaten last night. I too think that it was a poor decsion to pass back to Shay, but Parker was maginificent last night, for F***'s sake. Just as he invariably is. Christ knows what he's done to deserve this abuse. Obviously no one can remember having to watch Clarence Acuna.....

 

I'll assume that's a wind-up, Acuna being one of the most under-rated players I've seen play for Newcastle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Imperio

I thought Parker had a good game last night, everyone played well so why can't we not just enjoy the fact that we got an unexpected point instead of reverting back to slating Parker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why was the ball passed back to Shay in the 1st place?

 

Becasue Scott the magnificent thought "we've kicked off, Shay's got a groin problem, his kicking's been iffy all game, let's test him from the kick off."

 

God I'm glad we didn't get beaten last night. I too think that it was a poor decsion to pass back to Shay, but Parker was maginificent last night, for F***'s sake. Just as he invariably is. Christ knows what he's done to deserve this abuse. Obviously no one can remember having to watch Clarence Acuna.....

Oh dear, I must have been logged in as my daughter and I'm not sure that she remembers Clarence Acuna or would use language like that! But seriously, everyone to his or her own but are there really NUFC supporters who truly believe that Clarence was a better defensive midfielder than Parker....? I can only think of David Batty that I would be as happy with in that role...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...