Northern Monkey Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Shola isnt half as bad as people make out! No, you're right, he's WORSE than some admit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamesD Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 one positive thing about shola being out for so long is that its made people like NM shut up for a bit. well, it was a nice break while it lasted i guess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Knightrider Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Shola isnt half as bad as people make out! Agreed, it is amazing how many rate him as shite, yet have the cheek to rip into him when he DOH, plays like shite. You can't have it both ways. Strangely when he does play well, these people go missing. He's an average Premiership striker and good enough for us, an average Premiership side. When everyone is fit he'll make a decent squad player. He cost fuck all and has shown himself far more committed than most over the years, including some of those with more ability than him, so I say cut the lad some slack. The way some go on you would actually think he'd shagged their wife or something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Shola is shit. Even worse than Milner. Worse player we have. If he gets a start (or even a sub) when we have anyone else available it will piss me of and make me shout for Glen's head. Most of the goals he scored for us under Glen were lucky fluke goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest scum Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Shola is shit. Even worse than Milner. Worse player we have. If he gets a start (or even a sub) when we have anyone else available it will piss me of and make me shout for Glen's head. Most of the goals he scored for us under Glen were lucky fluke goals. yawn yawn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Shola is shit. Even worse than Milner. Worse player we have. If he gets a start (or even a sub) when we have anyone else available it will piss me of and make me shout for Glen's head. Most of the goals he scored for us under Glen were lucky fluke goals. Boring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toptoon Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Owen Martins Sibierski New Players in that order. Not good enough: Ameobi Not strikers. Ever: Milner, Dire, Duff. Beg to differ. Shola causes defenders alot more problems than Le sib does and scores more too (under Roeder). He's better than Le Sib imo. Dyer is crap in CM imo and should be played either RW or whilst Owen is out, up top with Martins as they link up well. Duff has been used just behind the main striker/as a striker on countless times for both Ireland and Chelski. You know better than Jose etc do you? Milner admittedly would be a last resort (out of those named earlier) up front. Although he's been our best our best player in the last two months and is getting better and better all the time. He's a good asset imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now