Guest elbee909 Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 Did you consider us to be such "failures" when we were playing in the Champions League ? The same person(s) appointing Souness and Roeder after having appointed Robson should tell you enough about the general trajectory we were on under Shepherd. FACT OFF, MOTHER FACTER! As in major shareholders ? Unless you also foolishly think they idly stand by and allow someone else to run the multi million pound company where they have the biggest stake mackems.gif Ok. Who were they then? mackems.gif mackems.gif mackems.gif Incidentally, you keep harping on about how Shepherd should receive credit if Allardryce is successful, for appointing him. Apparently not though, that'll be those major shareholders who get credit for that, yep? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 Did you consider us to be such "failures" when we were playing in the Champions League ? The same person(s) appointing Souness and Roeder after having appointed Robson should tell you enough about the general trajectory we were on under Shepherd. FACT OFF, MOTHER FACTER! As in major shareholders ? Unless you also foolishly think they idly stand by and allow someone else to run the multi million pound company where they have the biggest stake mackems.gif Ok. Who were they then? mackems.gif mackems.gif mackems.gif THE FUCKING HALLS!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shak Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 PWNED!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 Did you consider us to be such "failures" when we were playing in the Champions League ? The same person(s) appointing Souness and Roeder after having appointed Robson should tell you enough about the general trajectory we were on under Shepherd. FACT OFF, MOTHER FACTER! As in major shareholders ? Unless you also foolishly think they idly stand by and allow someone else to run the multi million pound company where they have the biggest stake mackems.gif Ok. Who were they then? mackems.gif mackems.gif mackems.gif THE FUCKING HALLS!!! Was a bit rhetorical there, heh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 Big Sam saying on SSN that basically while the takeover is good the new owners are causing him to miss out on targets because of their reluctancy to release funds until internal inquiry is over! he didn't say that, he said failure to move quickly. he has funds I'm positive he said something along the lines of: With the big changearound that has happened with the new owners coming in, they have yet to understand the need to move quickly in the market because of other things they are pursuing, i understand that but need to move quicker. Some of the players have come and gone but others will become availible Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 Big Sam saying on SSN that basically while the takeover is good the new owners are causing him to miss out on targets because of their reluctancy to release funds until internal inquiry is over! he didn't say that, he said failure to move quickly. he has funds I'm positive he said something along the lines of: With the big changearound that has happened with the new owners coming in, they have yet to understand the need to move quickly in the market because of other things they are pursuing, i understand that but need to move quicker. Some of the players have come and gone but others will become availible and? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE5 Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 Did you consider us to be such "failures" when we were playing in the Champions League ? The same person(s) appointing Souness and Roeder after having appointed Robson should tell you enough about the general trajectory we were on under Shepherd. FACT OFF, MOTHER FACTER! As in major shareholders ? Unless you also foolishly think they idly stand by and allow someone else to run the multi million pound company where they have the biggest stake mackems.gif Ok. Who were they then? mackems.gif mackems.gif mackems.gif THE FUCKING HALLS!!! don't know whether to laugh or cry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manorpark Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I thought this might get delayed, but NUFC have been delisted from the LSE, as of 8am today. http://www.londonstockexchange.com/LSECWS/IFSPages/MarketNewsPopup.aspx?id=1533201&source=RNS There is another thread on 'delisting' - but it only seems right to take this old thread all the way through to it's logical conclusion! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 I thought this might get delayed, but NUFC have been delisted from the LSE, as of 8am today. http://www.londonstockexchange.com/LSECWS/IFSPages/MarketNewsPopup.aspx?id=1533201&source=RNS There is another thread on 'delisting' - but it only seems right to take this old thread all the way through to it's logical conclusion! I think the thread should now be locked, it's all over now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 This thread has come to its conclusion now, Mick's right. Locked. Move discussion to 'Newcastle delisted from the Stock Exchange - Official' thread - http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=42840.0 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts