Jump to content

The other games today - 2008/09


Recommended Posts

Since the day Parker left there's been a hole in our midfield that's yet to be filled.

 

Our CM is getting ran over week after week cause it's pretty much non existant.  Parker was excellent at breaking down other teams attacks, something none of our current CM's can do.

 

Barton is better than Parker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the day Parker left there's been a hole in our midfield that's yet to be filled.

 

Our CM is getting ran over week after week cause it's pretty much non existant.  Parker was excellent at breaking down other teams attacks, something none of our current CM's can do.

 

Barton is better than Parker.

 

In theory, yeah. Parker doesn't get into nearly enough shit as Barton does though and is no way near as injury prone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He doesn't break down play though, he runs around a lot and gets in people's faces but you'll rarely see him intercept a pass like a Makelele or Carrick who are true defensive midfielders. Barton is just as good as getting in people's faces (haaa) but can use the ball once he gets it. Barton is more injury prone but I thought we were talking about ability?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble is that ability doesn't count for much if you're never in a position to use it. I think we got a very good deal with the money for Parker, but after all the crap that Barton has brought on this club I feel like we've been cockslapped with the 5.8m we paid for him.. it was about that I think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble is that ability doesn't count for much if you're never in a position to use it. I think we got a very good deal with the money for Parker, but after all the crap that Barton has brought on this club I feel like we've been cockslapped with the 5.8m we paid for him.. it was about that I think?

 

Was it not 6.5, as we had to pay his loyalty bonus as he resfused to leave man city otherwise.  I think man city were refusing to pay it due to his "problems".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble is that ability doesn't count for much if you're never in a position to use it. I think we got a very good deal with the money for Parker, but after all the crap that Barton has brought on this club I feel like we've been cockslapped with the 5.8m we paid for him.. it was about that I think?

 

Was it not 6.5, as we had to pay his loyalty bonus as he resfused to leave man city otherwise.  I think man city were refusing to pay it due to his "problems".

 

Yeah it was something like that but I can't remember the actual fee. I think he had a release clause but we ended up paying £500k over that to cover the loyalty bonus or something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

problem wasnt getting rid of parker it was in failing to replace him. He's better than Butt, Geremi, Smith, Nolan and Guthrie. Barton is the only one better though he is a different sort of player and for obvious reasons rarely plays. Considering how slow and soft we can be in the middle Parker would make a difference as, for all his faults, he has an excellent engine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Stephen927

I liked Parker when he was here, it's hard not to like someone who grafts and isn't afraid to put his foot in... his trouble came when he was asked to play more offensively while Emre was asked to sit deeper.

 

He isn't the type of player who changes a game, more often than not he'll just keep play ticking, hold onto the ball to keep possession.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how we miss Scott Parker

 

Yep.  Pathetic making him a scapegoat when he was here.

 

A big case of you don't know what you've got til it's gone.

I beg to differ. I fail to see what he really offers when compared to Guthrie.

 

completely different players for one

How they, seem exactly the same to me, neither attacking or defensive, your bog standard centre midfielder, the only difference is Guthrie seems to have better technique.

 

Parker is a lot more defensively accomplished than Guthrie. Young Danny as you said has better technique, isn't half as dymanic as parker but sprays the ball about better and with more positivity

Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem with Parker was that he was never the same after his tackle on Bullard. still shouldn't have sold him though.

 

He was, it just took us that long to find him out.

 

:thup:

 

I had a massive argument recently about Parker being no more than average...you should have waded in to back me up you fecker!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest sicko2ndbest

Chelski one up over Coventry. Drogba again. He's doing well with Gus.

 

Great finish, goal out of nothing, Drogba at his best

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chelski one up over Coventry. Drogba again. He's doing well with Gus.

 

Great finish, goal out of nothing, Drogba at his best

 

More like shambolic defending, still a good finish though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Heneage

Brilliant break away goal from Chelsea. Excellent ball in from the wing by Quaresma.

do love Quaresma. Brilliant pass, I hope Chelsea sign him because at times he's a joy to watch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...