Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I wonder if Howe had to confirm the Bruno story because Ashworth would have released the information this weekend ? He has a real Dominic Cummings vibe about him the snake
  3. That's why it wouldn't suprise me if Dummett gets an extension, to much fewwwwm.
  4. That's completely different from saying that they are. And if he did, it would be easy for me to find it. I don't think that it's wrong to talk about court cases, unless you actually say someone is guilty, which he didn't. He knows how to word himself in these cases in a way that everyone knows what he means, but he doesn't actually say it. That way he avoids the trouble, or avoid being told that he was wrong, in which he can just say "I didn't say that". That sly bugger.
  5. Big day today. Chelsea and West Ham have two tough games. Fancy Manure to beat Burnley mind
  6. So you first give a completely irrelevant answer, then acted the prick, nice one
  7. Mate I really can't be fucked to keep going back and forward with you and it's not really a big deal. Why would I make it up?I've heard him myself say things like "city broke the rules" when at this moment they haven't been found guilty of that. Anyone that listens to him regularly can clearly see he thinks city are guilty and he digs them about it too. It's a dangerous thing to do involving court cases etc.
  8. Christ on a bike. And they’ve got the gall to call us thick as fuck.
  9. HaydnNUFC

    On this day...

    Year ago today already. My favourite ever away game, one of the best games in general I've been to. Great night.
  10. The articles are writing everything that he is saying on the podcasts, in quotes. It's not something that he is writing himself. I saw videos aswell, there is no video of him saying that they ARE guilty. You could still give me an example it I'm wrong on that. As I said he is just criticising them for how they deal with the process, he never said that they ARE guilty. Insinuating shouldn't really be illegal, are journalist all supposed to talk about how they must be innocent? "Oh they are sabotaging the investigation, but you know, they probably have their reason since they must be innocent." That would definetly not be one sided. Saying that people who refuse to cooperate in investigations are usually guilty is just a pure fact.
  11. Know nothing about him buy nice to read things like this if we are interested.
  12. I’m sure Douglas mentioned him ages ago.
  13. I’m hoping for a reaction to Wednesday. “Ramming speed” But yeah I’ll take a win.
  14. Yes please. I mentioned him a while back. Kid’s gonna be a star.
  15. Equivalent to begging this And I'm all for it Well played lads
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...