Jump to content

Mimms

Member
  • Posts

    57
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mimms

  1. Last thing I’m saying on here. Been told there will be another statement this week.
  2. Nothing to gain by blowing smoke up peoples arseholes, I’ve passed on the information I’ve received, it’s proved to be right. I haven’t come on here to argue with people, simply pass on what I’ve been told. Appreciate the people that give me a thumbs up but I’m too old to be arguing with people who don’t want to believe what I’m passing on. As I said there’s a meeting in the next few days, hopefully it goes the way we all want but I’ll be keeping quiet about any information passed onto me from now on, not worth the hassle of going back and forth attempting to dispel stuff every 5 minutes. Call it a over reaction/me throwing my toys out the pram, I really couldn’t care.
  3. And compare that to him constantly calling him out and @‘ing him at every chance. Believe what you wish. If you don’t want to believe anything I post them pop me on ignore and stop ruining the thread
  4. He said there would be news just before some news came out. A vague guess like MoneyMikeAshley which he’s now riding the back of an ITK storm He’s been posting there would be more news for about 4 weeks so he’ll strike lucky eventually again soon. :lol: Well none of what you posted is right but you seem to be consistent at that.
  5. Which happened... You do realise when I say a meeting they don’t all sit around in a big boardroom like the apprentice don’t you?
  6. Been told there’s a meeting happening in next 24-48 hours with all parties.
  7. This will 100% happen if/when the takeover goes through. None of the buyers want him in charge a minute longer than he has to be. If that’s the case and they’re confident of taking over, surely they’d be having words with Ashley or whoever about getting him out now? Ashley loves him, no matter how confident the buyers will be, Ashley is still in charge. We all remember when they thought it was all sealed and delivered. He will be removed if it goes through.
  8. This will 100% happen if/when the takeover goes through. None of the buyers want him in charge a minute longer than he has to be.
  9. Source I’m getting the snippets from definitely knows more than he’s letting on and the bits of information he does pass on have usually happened 2-3 days ago (at least). Thats not answering his question . In fact its actively avoiding it ... It’s answering in the question that I’ve told you as much as I currently know. If/when I find out more then I’ll pass it on ASAP as I have been doing.
  10. Source I’m getting the snippets from definitely knows more than he’s letting on and the bits of information he does pass on have usually happened 2-3 days ago (at least).
  11. Does what your hearing make you confident this will happen ? It’s made the buying side much more positive (although we know they’ve been positive a number of times and we know that the outcome wasn’t good) Staveley now thinks this gets done before Xmas with the latest lawyer news.
  12. Progress I mentioned is due to a different direction that the lawyers have explored/exploited.
  13. Inching forward. Not quite #cans but some progress has been made in last 24-48 hours.
  14. From what I’ve been told (and previously said), if this goes to court, the buying side doesn’t lose in a month of Sunday’s. It simply comes down to the timeframe.
  15. They want it done to make the most of the relaxing of FFP, the longer it goes on the more they realise the club will drop away from that pack that they want to get into nevermind the “top 4/6.”
  16. Bit of an update (not much from last time) but the lawyers hired by Ashley now are convinced that if this goes to court there is no way they will lose this case, enough evidence to wipe the floor with the PL. The only thing that stops this now is time. Bruce will also be gone if/when the takeover goes through. They don’t like his football at all and they realise that he’s not good enough. IF this gets done in the timeframe they want then there will be as much spending as possible on players regardless of the position of the club in the January window. For now they have set their sights on competing with Leicester/Everton/Wolves, basically 5th-9th.
  17. Doesn't really add up does it! It doesn’t but this is the information I’ve been told. If you don’t wish to read it/believe what I’ve been told then pop me on ignore
  18. Buyers now want this signed off before the start of next year or will knock it on the head, before 2021 is their deadline. Not sure if this is PIF, Reubens, Staveley or all 3.
  19. By long, long way off is this because they expect to go to court? Or do they expect to settle outside? Legal team trying to avoid that, not because they don’t think they won’t win more down the talks progressing in their favour. Doesn’t think the outcome is happening anytime soon though. (Won’t be this side of 2020)
  20. Good news - The legal team are very, very positive. The not so good news - This is still a long, long way off.
  21. That would be Doxing and would be illegal. The abuse he gave Edwards isn’t very clever wether you like the account or not. Just passing on what I’ve been told, like I did in regards to the statement... what would revealing him do like? it's not illegal to take thepiss No quite true, although there must be a reason as to why. If people don’t want to believe the information I’ve passed on that’s fine. Although after the information I gave regarding the announcement I do recall a few people on here apologising after doubting me. I don't disbeleive it, I'm saying, so what if he outs him? I had heard from a different person that told me about the announcement and the above that the money Mike account has a few people running it, one is getting their information from possibly someone quite high up within the club, wether this has come back and Edwards now knows this person is a possibility although I don’t know/trust the person enough for this to be concrete compared to the person who told me this as much as I do the former.
  22. That would be Doxing and would be illegal. The abuse he gave Edwards isn’t very clever wether you like the account or not. Just passing on what I’ve been told, like I did in regards to the statement... what would revealing him do like? it's not illegal to take thepiss No quite true, although there must be a reason as to why. If people don’t want to believe the information I’ve passed on that’s fine. Although after the information I gave regarding the announcement I do recall a few people on here apologising after doubting me.
  23. I can’t be him. I actually posted information that was factually correct...
×
×
  • Create New...