Jump to content

Grimsby93

Member
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Grimsby93

  1. If you haven't done so then read the full letter to the Prime Minister, absolute rambling nonsense. I very much doubt it will ever see the eyes of the PM. NCSL may well have a QC they keep naming but there is not a chance in hell any of their published letters have been drafted by a junior legal professional let alone a QC. The takeover doesn't really exist anymore, PIF pulled out and Ashley instigated arbitration proceedings. I've no doubt PIF are waiting in the wings to come back if that arbitration is successful and they are given a unilateral undertaking their O&D application would be approved. But right now all we have is a twitter storm whipped up by a few well known individuals, with the expect help of a certain journalist no one had ever heard of a few months ago. They said they would issue legal action through the Competition Appeals Tribunal if they didn't get what they wanted - they then didn't get what they wanted and just wrote more letters, asked fans to written letters to MPs and now a very badly drafted letter to the Prime Minister. It's noise, and just making more noise.... more followers, more views for someone's shows on youtube show... all the whole stringing along fans that are simply desperate after the awful 13 years or so of Mike Ashley.
  2. Really going for it would perhaps be issuing the legal proceedings in the Competition Appeals Tribunal - which they said they would - not write a load of letters. It's a load of illogical, disorganised emotive crap, pulling fans along for a ride with no logical destination. Atleast they're trying something? Better then doing nothing, or bitching about them online. As far as I can see from their Twitter account they've spent more time slagging off other Newcastle fans than trying to achieve anything meaningful. It's all a scam - strings being pulled primarily by Steve Wraith.
  3. Really going for it would perhaps be issuing the legal proceedings in the Competition Appeals Tribunal - which they said they would - not write a load of letters. It's a load of illogical, disorganised emotive crap, pulling fans along for a ride with no logical destination.
  4. In the first paragraph he attacks those who claim to have inside knowledge. Then claims inside knowledge in the second paragraph. Not really, this is what said people in the first paragraph have been telling people in private.
  5. Serious questions should be asked of Amanda Staveley and the consortium but it doesn't fit the everything positive even if totally made up bullshit is good narrative. She's desperate, they're desperate. It's a total fucking mess.
  6. Says the person referring to someone as "Puke" Hmm, interesting first post. Maybe Edwards has a friend? A second device more like no idea what you are on about but i've got about 7 devices, pc, laptop, work laptop, phone, work phone, ipad, work ipad etc.
×
×
  • Create New...