WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 they at least have plenty of obscure players for him to try and get playing well as with Fulham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 So Roy will end up managing a worse team than were he was before moving to Liverpool. That worked out well for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 So Roy will end up managing a worse team than were he was before moving to Liverpool. That worked out well for him. Its better to try and fail than settle for mediocrity. Its was his chance to manage a big club. He will work his way back. Dont blame him for trying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 I reckon Roy had done pretty much all he could with Fulham. He'd have been mental to reject the Liverpool job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 So Roy will end up managing a worse team than were he was before moving to Liverpool. That worked out well for him. Its better to try and fail than settle for mediocrity. Its was his chance to manage a big club. He will work his way back. Dont blame him for trying. Were you trying for a Haiku there? And yes, I get what you mean, but he should have known better. Liverpool were never going to meet their fans' expectations this season and it was always a losing proposition. Surely he could have gone to a more stable club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughesy Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 The prospect of a decent pay off if he failed probably helped.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 So Roy will end up managing a worse team than were he was before moving to Liverpool. That worked out well for him. Its better to try and fail than settle for mediocrity. Its was his chance to manage a big club. He will work his way back. Dont blame him for trying. Were you trying for a Haiku there? And yes, I get what you mean, but he should have known better. Liverpool were never going to meet their fans' expectations this season and it was always a losing proposition. Surely he could have gone to a more stable club. Haha, noo way man, i just rolled out of me... I still disagree with you, i think he did everything right in giving the job a shot. If you think you are a good manager, and you believe you have what it takes, you go for it! Any manager with ambition would take it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Fair enough, guess that given his age he saw it as a last chance to get into the big boys club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Decent move for club and manager tbh. Their levels match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NewBoyPeetah Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Great move for WBA. Hope they still fill a Relegation spot though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Good. Now can they fuck off to CC, and stay there, without any mixed feelings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 I'm quite relieved it's Hodgson. The prospect of Chris sending us down on the last day was too awful to think about. The media would have been dining out on it for months. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
80 Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 West Bromwich have more of a future in them than Fulham. Whether he'll have the opportunity to bring it out of them I don't know, but they've more gravitas as a club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Ahhh man, thats a good appointment for them. I just want one of our relegation rivals to do something shit like lose a match or appoint a rubbish manager - maybe one day they will. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 hmm roy isn't a instant impact manager, he needs time to bed in his methods before they take effect (fulham were awful after he took over until final few weeks of season) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 I'm quite relieved it's Hodgson. The prospect of us sending Chris down on the last day was too awful to think about. The media would have been dining out on it for months. This. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Let's see if we can make him to that rubby-face thing at SJP twice in the same season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 You would think there was only about 5 football managers in the world. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beezeri Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 I said it before Roy moved to Liverpool that he's best with teams whose strenght is at defence and Liverpool wasn't such team but WBA is even less like that! Roy did great with Finland international team and Fulham where were players like Hyypiä, Tihinen, Hangeland etc. and they weren't expected to win more that lose. WBA fans will hate Roy from the day one for playing such shitty defence minded style(compared to Di Matteo). Can't really blame them as I couldn't watch his teams playing either although he did get some good results with Finland Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 West Bwom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Welcome Woy. SSN: Contract until Summer 2012. Call him 'Head Coach' too. That'll probably be something to do with the fact they didn't properly 'sack' Di Matteo but rather placed him on gardening leave. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Aye, Dowie at Hull was "Football Management Consultant" or summat daft. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Getting a better manager and not a casino buddy? idiots. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Welcome Woy. SSN: Contract until Summer 2012. Call him 'Head Coach' too. That'll probably be something to do with the fact they didn't properly 'sack' Di Matteo but rather placed him on gardening leave. di matteo was head coach as well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quayside Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Welcome Woy. SSN: Contract until Summer 2012. Call him 'Head Coach' too. That'll probably be something to do with the fact they didn't properly 'sack' Di Matteo but rather placed him on gardening leave. di matteo was head coach as well He was. It's because WBA have a director of football (or similar title) and he will be Woy's boss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now