Jump to content

Daft questions (football edition)


Recommended Posts

Ryan_Taylor

Is there anything to stop one of the billionaire owners from letting one of their small children register to play in the Premier League and requesting they be substituted on to take/score a penalty one day when Citeh are three-nil up against someone?

 

Would depend on the age but once they were over 15 or so I'd guess not ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exiled in Texas

We played a game yesterday, and a strange situation occured. One of our lads came through on goal, and the keeper rushed out and obstructed him, just like any other defender. He was nowhere near the ball. The ref gave an indirect free-kick in the box, and didn't even book the gk.

 

You don't see things like that very often. Did the ref make the right decision, or should it have been a pen?

 

Obstruction (or technically impeding) means that there is no foul because there is not physical contact. The lack of physical contact makes this a technical infringement which is an IFK. Had there been physical contact then it would have been a DFK and that in that location it would have been a penalty.

 

I must be missing something. How can you be obstructed if there is no physical contact? If I'm going somewhere and you want to stop me, you're going to have to do it physically. I'm assuming of course that you would not stoop so low as to threaten to sully my reputation, thereby causing me to lose control of the ball, for that would be frowned upon even in the colonies, egad.

 

 

It means moving into the path of the opponent to force them to slow down or change direction to get around you. Players are entitled to their own position on the field, but they cannot move into the path of the opponent with the sole intent of blocking their path (implied here is that the ball is not within playing distance)

 

But the key difference between the referee giving a DFK or an IFK is whether there is contact (a foul).

Link to post
Share on other sites

We played a game yesterday, and a strange situation occured. One of our lads came through on goal, and the keeper rushed out and obstructed him, just like any other defender. He was nowhere near the ball. The ref gave an indirect free-kick in the box, and didn't even book the gk.

 

You don't see things like that very often. Did the ref make the right decision, or should it have been a pen?

 

Obstruction (or technically impeding) means that there is no foul because there is not physical contact. The lack of physical contact makes this a technical infringement which is an IFK. Had there been physical contact then it would have been a DFK and that in that location it would have been a penalty.

 

I must be missing something. How can you be obstructed if there is no physical contact? If I'm going somewhere and you want to stop me, you're going to have to do it physically. I'm assuming of course that you would not stoop so low as to threaten to sully my reputation, thereby causing me to lose control of the ball, for that would be frowned upon even in the colonies, egad.

 

 

It means moving into the path of the opponent to force them to slow down or change direction to get around you. Players are entitled to their own position on the field, but they cannot move into the path of the opponent with the sole intent of blocking their path (implied here is that the ball is not within playing distance)

 

But the key difference between the referee giving a DFK or an IFK is whether there is contact (a foul).

 

Oh. I'd probably just try to run through them tbh :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exiled in Texas

Most do, and that would make it a foul (and DFK) not impeding/obstruction (and a IFK)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything to stop one of the billionaire owners from letting one of their small children register to play in the Premier League and requesting they be substituted on to take/score a penalty one day when Citeh are three-nil up against someone?

 

Would depend on the age but once they were over 15 or so I'd guess not ???

 

Paul Dogleash anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything to stop one of the billionaire owners from letting one of their small children register to play in the Premier League and requesting they be substituted on to take/score a penalty one day when Citeh are three-nil up against someone?

 

Gaddafi did with his son for Perugia IIRC. though not through actually owning the club. More through being all "I kill you!"

 

Unless you were talking about age, then IIRC the rule is you have to be 16 or over in the Premier League. /FM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dr Colossus

Messi scored one a bit like that a few years ago against Recreativo Huelva. Not sure how subtly I can put this, but try looking on a popular video sharing website. O0

Link to post
Share on other sites

always wondered this too, albeit obviously if you do it more than once guess people will cover it, tried it on fifa against mate mind didn;t come off :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

How's that?

 

They don't have Mike Ashley for owner, Alan Pardew for manager, or Derek Llambias for director.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gazza ladra

Mark Hughes linked to the Stoke job.

 

I don't get it. Why do Premier League clubs keep hiring this guy? What has he ever accomplished as a manager?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thup:

 

Why don't any/many teams try the genius Argentina Swedish freekick from the 1998 1994 World Cup?

 

FYP  ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...