Jump to content

Chris Wood (now playing for Nottingham Forest)


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form and he isn't good enough to build our whole team around. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vinny Green Balls
2 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Why? What specifically have I said that is not true?

The grammar is decent apart from one run-on sentence. That's about all I can say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form and he isn't good enough to build our whole team around. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

??????

Link to post
Share on other sites

MrRaspberryJam
8 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

There's a big difference between Harry Kane who get goals playing for a Tottenham team who are set up to facilitate him and our team that are set up in a very different way. We shouldn't delete everything we have just to slot in one player who is good, but not as good as players you would actually build a team around like Barca did with Messi.

 

Kane would score a boatload at us. He'd score a boatload anywhere. He's fantastic. 

 

Redundant argument anyway as we're not signing him. 

 

I think you've had a dodgy batch of spice mind. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form and he isn't good enough to build our whole team around. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

 

 

@admin ban please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vinny Green Balls
Just now, Pixelphish said:

Fair play for posting that knowing you're gunna get pasted.

He seemed pretty indignant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He’d pretty much guarantee you 30 odd goals a season for the next three to four years, as well as being excellent in the build up, but nah, not good enough for us. Not that we have any chance of getting him mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vinny Green Balls
1 minute ago, Miggys First Goal said:

Turning our noses up at Harry Kane, man [emoji38]

Looks like the last of us apocalypse has begun.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MrRaspberryJam
25 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form and he isn't good enough to build our whole team around. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

 

 

 

Can we delete that?.. We should. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vinny Green Balls
Just now, Klaus said:

I mean, if kane isn't good enough, who the fuck is?

 

Haaland or ne cunt? :lol:


Haaland would disrupt our style. We can do better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...