indi Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 why would someone wanting to take over and being able to get 70% of the shares be put off buy shepherd 29% ? Because they couldn't de-list the company for one thing and 29% is a significant holding, they couldn't just ignore his wishes, even if they owned the rest of the shares. Also if there are other minority shareholders who didn't want to sell they wouldn't be able to do a compulsory purchase on their shares, because they wouldn't have reached the required percentage, so in actual fact they'd be unlikely to be able to secure all the other shares and therefore their percentage would probably end up even lower than 71%. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now