I mean, it's all about points of view I guess. There's plenty of players I wouldn't want us to sign, and I'll happily talk about it on a football forum.
Neither of them were considered average at the time. The point made was £40m is the going rate for an average player. I'm just wondering what that is being based on.
Anderson who a lot of people on here wanted to sign? Johnson who was extremely highly rated? We're not talking about hindsight here.
I'm not even sure I know who Master is though