Shearergol

Hard work now. Big 15 minutes plus 10 stoppage time left for us.

Wrong team mate.

Lansbury with his 4th bookable offence.

Gayle's gonna be knackered soon

Him and the ref.

Played vurn!

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong. You said it's a red, which it's not. It's like arguing with a woman. No, I've not once said it's a red. I said the ref had a choice, in response to you saying he didn't know the laws. Fine, fair enough. Well the other officials should tell him in that radio system they have. This standard of officiating is abysmal. Wasn't even a foul for me just to be clear on my thoughts ?

I'm still baffled by gouffran's booking as much as anything.

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong. You said it's a red, which it's not. It's like arguing with a woman. No, I've not once said it's a red. I said the ref had a choice, in response to you saying he didn't know the laws.

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong.

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Post it then. http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10242286/ifab-anounces-law-changes-softening-rules-on-fouls-in-the-penalty-area The rules posted are the actual laws, not a sky representation. It's no longer an automatic red card but still can be.

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Post it then.

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. Thanks.

This'll be 4-1 now. How the fuck is that a booking?

Handball tbh

Fuck off football

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules I have, and they've been posted and quoted many times in this very thread. If the challenge is deemed deliberate he can send him off.

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off.

98th minute.

Glad you asked, nobody else has mentioned it.

Both penalties and red cards were correctly given imo. Dum dum and Shelvey are thick as pig shit unfortunately. WUM. What could dummett do there?? Run to the side of him...? How could he predict HL would plant his feet? He was running to the side of him!

Both penalties and red cards were correctly given imo. Dum dum and Shelvey are thick as pig shit unfortunately. WUM. What could dummett do there??

How many times? Stopping a goal scoring chance is no longer an automatic red card, it's now up to the ref. Double jeapordy was scrapped before the season started.

correct so the ref doesn't even know the laws of the game Nah, it's changed again.

Not an automatic red, ref can decide now.