Dinho lad

10 minutes ago, 54 said:

Dinho, I get that you have completely different viewpoints to the majority on here, myself included (jnfact I disagree with pretty much everything you've posted), and you are trying to impart your opinion on to others as well as explain why you have these views. You are your own person, and you're entitled to them, and this is a forum at the end of the day, but the way you are going on at the moment is very condescending, patronizing, ignorant and in some cases downright insulting, and given you're challenging people's core beliefs people are naturally starting to get riled up because of it, and I think you'll be better off remembering that people (myself included) are going to start biting back with the way you are going, and things will turn toxic fast, which I don't think many people want when logging into a Football forum.

I receive a lot of abuse here as well, fella. Actually, quite a few insults and condescending stuff about me also happens in conversation that I'm not even part of. They could have the decency to tag me, at least. 

6 minutes ago, Klaus said:

 

Did your dog die recently or something? Your craic has been lifting in here and in chat, in recent times.

Don't like dogs... don't like pets. Don't mind animals.... just don't want to look after them. 

2 minutes ago, Klaus said:

You must be fun at parties

Didn't expect a better response from an ignorant and misinformed soul. Well, at least you enjoyed your one liner. 

7 hours ago, Klaus said:

I somewhat believe in a countries sovereignty to have their own laws and culture etc, but that is just

 

Expecting gay and unmarried football supporters to avoid any intimacy is just mental. I kind of expected them to turn a blind eye to it, considering the eyes of the world will be on the tournament.

 

 

 

Do you like being ignorant and misinformed or something?? Public display of affection is frowned up for all types of sexual relationships - hetro, homo or whatever. I'm not sure if it's even law, but simply not part of the social culture there. Homosexuals, unmarried couple, etc, can come to Qatar and feel safe and of course do whatever they want behind closed doors. What more do you want considering it's a one month event?? To change their laws and culture for it? Dream on, they don't have to change for anyone, they'll do it when it's right for them. 

For your information btw, the extent of public display of affection is not ruled by zero-tolerance. For example, homosexuals will be able to hold hands in public and they will have no one approaching them and bothering them. Like the Qataris promised, everyone is welcome and it's safe (well, at least no more dangerous than anywhere else). I'm pretty sure they can even kiss in public (anything more than that is degenerate and  frowned up quite a lot in the West anyway!)  but it's probably restricted to alternative areas such as bar, clubs, hotels (same for alcohol), etc, away from family-orientated spaces like religious sites, housing areas, etc. Even in the west there are areas where drinking or public display of affection is regulated. So what if Qatar has a wider area of regulation?! 

Now that we're close to the world cup, the main important point is the hospitality and safety of visitors. That, I'm quite sure, will not be a problem.  The issue of their laws, practices, and social customs should have been brought up much more in the past when it was more effective to do so. 

But anyway..... stop your misinformed, ignorant shit. The homosexuality ruling in Qatar is not enforced! But, I'll tell you what's enforced...… fucking 'capital punishment' in the fucking USA! I'm sure there wouldn't be many complaints when they host the next world cup!  

1 minute ago, The Prophet said:

The ignore function is a blessing.

So is your ignorance. 

Well, on the other hand, everyone that says anything remotely negative about women is conceptualised as such and such. That attitude is ridiculous and much more simple than what the 'black pill' or whatever pill preaches.  

6 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Dinho this black pill shite is no where near as impressive as you think it is, man 

 

It's proper basic stuff twisted in a very, very weird way.

Don't subscribe to that, thank you.  

Astaghfirullah, brother! 

6 hours ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

Did I? Pretty sure you're confusing me for someone else, considering I've been in a relationship with the mother of my child for 8 years, was in a 4 year relationship before that, and single for 5 years before that.

 

But yeah you're right, lacking emotion, denying yourself romantic intimacy, and never being vulnerable or showing weakness is totally what masculinity is.  

 

 

 

No I'm not confusing you with someone else! I'm sure of it!  I'm sure you know I'm right, and that your form of denial is deliberately not an explicit denial incase you might need to change your tune in the future. You do that A LOT!   Your 'word play' and twisting of meaning is one of the worst I've seen anywhere!  The bloody North Korean propaganda machine are more convincing than you!   You definitely need more practice on 'clever' wording. Your wording re your relationship history is, again, not convincing. Are you saying you immediately went from a 4 year relationship into the 8 year relationship? No space in between? And even if there wasn't, you can still understand 'how it feels like' even before experiencing it. Anyway, your relationship history is not something I wanted to know about! But I had to respond directly to it as it's another example of your poor wordplay.

As for your last sentence, I'm not sure what you're on about. A form of masculinity is standing up for yourself even if the crowd are against you. Another form of masculinity is being strong enough as a man to handle life alone and that the attention of females shouldn't be a need that makes you being desperate (as you sounded in that post) to be in pretty much any relationship. 

5 minutes ago, madras said:

Show your workings out.

Do your research, you'll find it. 

8 minutes ago, Kasper said:

 

Amazing. Good job keeping them safe guys.

You mean the construction workers? 

Again, do your research! You're letting the media fool you soo much, it's embarrassing.

For example, irrc, one measure for 'death' (that the media used) was to enquire with the government of x,y,z country to ask if x,y,z person returned to them or not. If the answer is no, this was counted as a death!  Clearly this 'measure' is not good enough. Cleary those 'dead' workers could be somewhere else right now doing whatever job/asylum seeking.

It's clear that the Qatar government made mistakes, but those were mistakes due to 'incompetence' and not due to disdain for the workers.  

I can list a long list of legal and societal inequalities, but why should i waste my time for people who are too lazy to investigate things beyond the broad mainstream narrative?  

Clearly, all you have to do is do a bit of research about it. Yes, not every argument is valid, but there's a lot of CLEAR equalities. But you'd only notice it if you actually bother coming out from your tried and trusted comfort zone. As I said, challenges to core beliefs can't be difficult for us human!  

@Kid Icarus That's just soooooo ironic coming from someone who is too emotional too often. Your once stated that you can't bear being on your own for too long without a relationship!!  So, what the fuck do you know about being masculine?  

You're nothing more than stereotyping me now. For your information, in the Arabic Gulf countries, it's much more safer for women there, more than in the Western world. 

But don't let this fact shake your lifelong ignorant assumptions and notions; it can be hard for a human being to accept challenges to his/her core beliefs. 

Just go to the pub, fella, that'll take your mind off things. 

6 hours ago, joeyt said:

 

From someone who cries about women's status in the world this is quite a statement

You're happy being subordinated for being an average male? Let me guess, you enjoy being dominated and Dom matrixed? (or whatever you call it).

Not much masculinity left in this part of the world. Shameful. 

This team, man!   

Yes, you're a bit of a cry arse. 

Actually, most of your post comes across as some sort rants from a irrational housewife. Says it all. 

And if you don't consider the progress Qatar made over the last decade or two as progress, then you're probably a fool who definitely needs to think rationally about it, with some perspective. 

2 minutes ago, Heron said:

Banging choon

Arabic music is full of banging tunes.

This one is ready and waiting for you in Qatar:

I don't know what critically appeared in red, but it's quite fitting for a parrot like you, Kid Icarus. 

6 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

No.

Erm, yes. You either want the middle east to progress (or 'progress', in my view) or you don't. If it's yes, then shut the fuck up about a middle eastern country participating with the world. 

Or maybe you can critically analyse your liberal idols in the media (i.e., that shit article in the Guardian re the 6500 deaths). 

17 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Interesting conflating of populations and governments into 'you' there. 

You condemning Qatar hosting the world cup is also implicitly saying the people of Qatar are not allowed to see their country hosting such event.

I doubt you'll be complaining if England win the rights to host Euro 2028. 

Anyway, a bit of perspective never harms:

You didn't stop enjoying life when you invaded other countries, so we're not going to stop enjoying our life when we're hosting a world event.  Deal with it. 

9 hours ago, joeyt said:

size of him

 

 

 

Absolute disgrace. I just don't understand people who are ok with looking and feeling like that.

At least dress appropriately ffs. 

Just now, JB said:

We're so good, could easily have scored 6 today

But did we make 6 subs? Or Flashscores got it wrong?  

71'

Murphy J.

Willock J.

71'

Targett M.

Botman S.

83'

Lascelles J.

Schar F.

83'

Shelvey J.

Guimaraes B.

86'

Saint-Maximin A.

Almiron M.

86'

Wood Ch.

Wilson C.