gdm

Wow I really upset you the other day didn’t I

Anyway, Luke is a twat, there may of may not be a budget and they may or may not spend when a good deal comes along. Let’s see what tomorrow brings. At least we now get to have these kind of debates

No one disagrees with you on this I don’t know why you keep saying it like I disagree

Fuckin hell the point is clear all journalists are saying the same thing. Just because Luke is a prick doesn’t change from fact he is saying the same thing as hope, caulkin, Waugh and others

I’m not saying it’s definately the case just in my opinion that’s what it looks like but I hope you are right and we have plenty to spend but a lack of progress for a diaby or a paqueta or now isak suggests we don’t have a great deal more to spend.

Thank fuck someone gets it

I agree he is a tedious prick but Luke isn’t my point so you aren’t getting it

I’m not the point is they are all Saying the same thing time and again about a budget and people just dismiss it as bullshit

Not the point. He’s not wrong that pretty much every journalist has said their is a strict budget. I hope they are all wrong I really do but maybe just maybe they are correct he’s saying ‘blow cash’ in the contest that we will use the remainder of the budget on that one player. Luke is a cock but he’s not saying anything that the likes of Douglas, Waugh, hope and more are saying

He’s not wrong tho the only journalist that hasn’t said there is a budget etc etc is jacobs. The rest all seem to be on same page

IF big IF Luke is correct and they are talking about wether to blow the whole budget on one of those players instead of getting a couple of players in. how would that stack up? no matter how much we are told there is a budget people just don’t want to believe it.

The wood signing was an act of desperation after that Cambridge game let’s not pretend otherwise

Is anyone still convinced we will pay if a player becomes available coz I’m not. Everything points to there being a rough budget that they aren’t willing to go too far over. We might just have to accept that

The original story says isak can play across the front 3. Does anyone think that we may see him as being that right sided forward? I know he’s barely played there but thinking about it that’s the only way that signing makes sense coz we have a very decent striker and very average right wingers.

It cost £18 to go see a Scottish 1st division game. I’d say £27-£35 for a premier League game isn’t too bad

I never say anything as fact always just my opinion. If you took it like that that’s your problem not mine

You are just an argumentative wee lad aren’t you bit early for the ‘I told you so’ we haven’t even bid and who knows albeit unlikely as he hasn’t played there much but howe might see him playing on the right.

Interesting vote

Isak has played on the right 3 times his whole career. Why we suddenly trying to shoe horn him in there

Yeah I agree with this.

Now that would be incredible

People might not like it but he does seem to get things right (budget aside)

The worst part of the transfer window and the reporting on it. So much of this nothing language how long does it take to ‘prepare a bid’ was great when stuff like that happened behind the scenes and first we heard of it when the bid was actually made. Now it just seems to drag on

Not sure I’d be happy with this. We need two players not just gamble on one coz he’s more expensive.