Jump to content

ChrisMcQuillan

Member
  • Posts

    3,975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ChrisMcQuillan

  1. Just now, Adam said:

    Why don't they add in a captain's challenge? VAR check it still but the captain can request once per game (maybe keep it if you are correct?) for the red to check the monitor. Yesterday Trippier uses his challenge to ask the ref to watch it. He is told Gordon is clipped and the ref can check it. 

     

    Same with havertz challenge at SJP, captain asks ref to check it and he's is off. 

    Agreed on this. They need to look to cricket on several areas. 

     

    So firstly, challenges. Each team has say two challenges. If they are correct, they keep the challenge, if they're wrong, they lose it. Same as tennis. Game goes to extra time, you get a challenge back. Simple.

     

    Then with offsides, they need to look at the LBW review in cricket. With ball tracking, they acknowledge it can't be 100% accurate (like offsides, where the camera frames can't know 100% when the ball leaves the foot. In a cricket LBW, if the ball is clearly hitting the stump it's given out. If it's clearly missing, it's not out. If less than half the ball is clipping the stumps, it's given as umpire's call, where the decision of the on-field umpire is retained.

     

    With offsides, the attacker line and the defender line should have a small margin of error (maybe an inch or two). If the two lines overlap, it goes down as "linesman's call" instead of "onside" or "offside" - and the onfield decision is retained. It would stop this nonsense of being millimetres offside.

     

     

  2. Been playing through an ankle injury. 

     

    He's clearly not the most gifted, but we've been lucky to have him available this season when other players haven't been. 

     

    I look forward to seeing him injury free next season. He's clearly been below his best, but he gets given far too hard a time - especially on the BBC player rater functionality. 

  3. 4 minutes ago, Erikse said:

     

    Honestly I don't understand what you mean by that.[emoji38]

    Was just a very "sitting on the fence" post :lol:

     

    Happy for him to be here,  unless he's poor, which he might be, but he also may not. If he is, then it's okay to say that he might have been, unless he isn't. :lol: 

     

    My reply was probably too abstract, apologies, just enjoyed your post haha.

  4. 1 hour ago, Erikse said:

    Don't mind him being here next season, but I have a feeling that next season we are going to start questioning whether it was right to keep him for another season or not. I hope I can look back at this and say that I was wrong. However, if he doesn't play anywhere near the levels that he used to, or can't keep up with our playstyle in terms of injuries and/or fatigue, it won't be hindsight to point out that we could've sold him (I'm sure the hindisght argument would be used). At the same time, we would need another RB if we sold him, so it's definelty not clearcut.

     

     

     

    I imagine your garden fence is quite worn down. :lol:

  5. 1 hour ago, TomYam said:

    Top 6 Clubs:

    Days Lost Through Injury

    Current Injuries

     

    1. Newcastle United

    1,658

    11

    2. Brentford

    1,512

    6

    3. Crystal Palace

    1,496

    5

    4. Sheffield United

    1,471

    9

    5. Chelsea

    1,443

    10

    6. Brighton & Hove Albion

    1,402

    10

     

    Do we win something? Perhaps a dented trophy with one handle missing?

     

    Add another 200 on for Tonali suspension...

×
×
  • Create New...