Jump to content

ChrisMcQuillan

Member
  • Posts

    3,985
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ChrisMcQuillan

  1. 15 hours ago, Rafalove said:


     

     

    Don’t know. Is it even as bad as the Roeder injury crisis?

    From memory Roeder had a month or two with about 11 or 12 players out, then usually had between 4 and 7 out for most of that crisis.

     

    We've had at least 9 players out for about six months, and I think we peaked at 13.

     

    So yeah, from memory, I think it's worse.

  2. 2 minutes ago, Rafalove said:


     

     

    How many injuries have been “freak” injuries?

    Off to the top of my head,

    • Barnes toe snapping off while jogging.
    • Burn's broken back.
    • Anderson's broken back.
    • Murphy's shoulder popping out (twice).
    • Pope's shoulder popping out.
    • And now Wilson's chest snapping.
  3. Annoyed if he goes.

     

    He was a symbol of the new era, a kind of "we're ready to take football seriously again" statement.

     

    Losing him to Manchester Fucking United of all clubs is a bitter pill to swallow.

     

    That said, he's not the only good Director of Football in the world, and provided we replace well, it's not a huge deal. Good riddance if he jumps ship so quickly.

  4. On 16/08/2020 at 16:36, mrmojorisin75 said:

    He'll still be here Colback-style in 4 years time cause when Bruce eventually gets jettisoned we'll not be able to get him off the books.

     

    Still he'll be good for the champo.


    This aged very well indeed. 

  5. 1 minute ago, Hhtoon said:

     

    Defers revenue to next year maybe? If we're not buying anyone and have nailed FFP for the last 3 years, then there is no benefit to additional revenue in this period. 

    Isn’t it done on a rolling 3 year basis, year by year? 
     

    In which case revenue is revenue and would benefit a three year period regardless. 

  6. 5 minutes ago, oldtype said:

    I continue to be puzzled by this narrative. Why do we have to sell one of our best players to “advance to the next stage of the project?” If we sell Bruno for 50m and buy his replacement for 50m how is that helping anything with regards to FFP? Why not just keep the good players we have and spend what we can instead?

    I think because if you sell the player for the cash up front, you can spread the replacement across five years, and that has an accounting impact.

     

    So selling Bruno for £50m, you could sign 3x £50m players on three year contracts.

     

    Or something to that effect.

     

    It's nonsense.

     

    Edit: @sushimonster85 explained it better above.

×
×
  • Create New...