taxfree

He's been very average to rubbish. He haven't played good enough to keep the place. People are just blinded by two great goals. Two clean sheets & wasnt much at fault in the fulham game. Then scores two goals to help us win two games. Yeah drop him we have a new player whos had much less time to train with us, great for team morale. Its hindsight nonsense, the choice to pick him was fine. Potentially it should have been changed, thats about it. Its Pardews job to show more faith in players than the fans do tbh. Fans perception of ability goes all over the place very quickly, as shown on here constantly. Stop going on about the clean sheets. It's all down to Coloccini and Steven Taylor being outstanding. Yes, he scored two goals - that shouldn't make him our f***ing left back. Of course we should drop a shitty player who have been average/rubbish. It has nothing with team morale to do. It's about winning games, not appease certain players. We had a speedy, talented, fit and in-form natural left back on the bench. Should be chosen 1000 out of 1000 times. Your post is rubbish from start to end. Absolute bollocks. Stop going on about us not conceding with him as part of the defence? Aye thats not relevant atall. Dangerous on set pieces in a manner that can win a side games? Definately not a potential benefit to be considered when picking any player. You're full of logic & definately not biased in any manner following what turned out to be a poor performance. Carry on getting riled up For the most part it's all down to our central defence being oustanding. Every half-brain is aware of that. Again, he's been average to s***, and shouldn't be our left back just because of his free kicks. Once again, rubbish post. Yeah your personal opinion of things really proved the point there, welldone mate Bore off.

He's been very average to rubbish. He haven't played good enough to keep the place. People are just blinded by two great goals. Two clean sheets & wasnt much at fault in the fulham game. Then scores two goals to help us win two games. Yeah drop him we have a new player whos had much less time to train with us, great for team morale. Its hindsight nonsense, the choice to pick him was fine. Potentially it should have been changed, thats about it. Its Pardews job to show more faith in players than the fans do tbh. Fans perception of ability goes all over the place very quickly, as shown on here constantly. Stop going on about the clean sheets. It's all down to Coloccini and Steven Taylor being outstanding. Yes, he scored two goals - that shouldn't make him our f***ing left back. Of course we should drop a shitty player who have been average/rubbish. It has nothing with team morale to do. It's about winning games, not appease certain players. We had a speedy, talented, fit and in-form natural left back on the bench. Should be chosen 1000 out of 1000 times. Your post is rubbish from start to end. Absolute bollocks. Stop going on about us not conceding with him as part of the defence? Aye thats not relevant atall. Dangerous on set pieces in a manner that can win a side games? Definately not a potential benefit to be considered when picking any player. You're full of logic & definately not biased in any manner following what turned out to be a poor performance. Carry on getting riled up For the most part it's all down to our central defence being oustanding. Every half-brain is aware of that. Again, he's been average to shit, and shouldn't be our left back just because of his free kicks. Once again, rubbish post.

He's been very average to rubbish. He haven't played good enough to keep the place. People are just blinded by two great goals. Two clean sheets & wasnt much at fault in the fulham game. Then scores two goals to help us win two games. Yeah drop him we have a new player whos had much less time to train with us, great for team morale. Its hindsight nonsense, the choice to pick him was fine. Potentially it should have been changed, thats about it. Its Pardews job to show more faith in players than the fans do tbh. Fans perception of ability goes all over the place very quickly, as shown on here constantly. Stop going on about the clean sheets. It's all down to Coloccini and Steven Taylor being outstanding. Yes, he scored two goals - that shouldn't make him our f***ing left back. Of course we should drop a shitty player who have been average/rubbish. It has nothing with team morale to do. It's about winning games, not appease certain players. We had a speedy, talented, fit and in-form natural left back on the bench. Should be chosen 1000 out of 1000 times. Your post is rubbish from start to end. Absolute bollocks. Well, I give you that last one though - you should think about that one yourself. You and two-goal Raylor.

Just stop, Nut. It was a horrible decision - that's all you need to know.

He's been very average to rubbish. He haven't played good enough to keep the place. People are just blinded by two great goals.

I know - he have to spare them and be positive in the media, but fucking hell. That's just blatant lying. I really hope he doesn't see it like that for himself. If he does, he needs the sack. It's that bad.

Needs to play. Needs to start ahead of our only ugly French bloke.

At least he sees it himself. He better play the obvious players against Villa.

It's simple Nut. Raylor is the option. That's really the only aspect you have to look at.

Enrique has been playing in this country for 4 years. Nowhere near the same. It's no real valid point anyway. Just come off it. He should've played today.

The footballing haven't been too good, and the coaching today was awful, but it's way too early to call for his exit. He needs to get a fucking grip though.

Raylor is a huge liability. He was awful. Why not give the natural left back, who also happens to be very talented, a shot? Just give over - you don't have a point. At all. I remember when Man Utd signed a superior highly-talented left-back, and he was torn apart by Sinclair (probably a similar standard then, to SWP now?) and was brought off half-time. :lol: Evra turned out pretty good mate. Yep but it didn't do Man Utd any favours that day did it? Granted R.Taylor was shocking tonight as well like... They'd play him ahead of Raylor every day of the week. Just as we should with Santon.

Wearside, just bore off. Sad human being of a know-nowt.

Raylor is a huge liability. He was awful. Why not give the natural left back, who also happens to be very talented, a shot? Just give over - you don't have a point. At all. I remember when Man Utd signed a superior highly-talented left-back, and he was torn apart by Sinclair (probably a similar standard then, to SWP now?) and was brought off half-time. Sounds good, Nutter

Raylor is a huge liability. He was awful. Why not give the natural left back, who also happens to be very talented, a shot? Just give over - you don't have a point. At all.

What? By miles.

Wow. It most likely would've been down to Raylor. He was one of their best players tbh. We had nothing to lose because Raylor played like he did. Santon couldn't have done worse.

In time we'll see Ba, Marveaux and Santon start. For the time being we've gone with tried and tested players and bedding the new players in slowly. It's quite a sensible approach, especially if fitness is an issue and it has clealy been with Ba and Marv. How are we bedding them in slowly, if they're (Santon) not even playing? He should start today - Raylor proved that. Why in the world Santon didn't even get some minutes with Raylor being so s***, is beyond me. Santon needs to play, he's fit, in good form - no excuses what so ever. The sensible approach is rubbish - loads of managers and players have shown that. You are aware that Santon has been at the club for a week? You are aware that our players train together in order to bed in? Perhaps - just perhaps - Pardew thinks it makes more sense to give Santon a week extra of getting to know the players, training with them etc before throwing him in? So fucking what. Raylor doesn't bed in what so ever. He is just rubbish. When you have such a talented natural left back on hand, no matter how fucking long you've had him, you have to play him. We had nothing to lose.

A joke of a footballer. Never rated him, unfortunately probably never will. Marveaux needs to play ahead of him. There should be 0 questions about that.

In time we'll see Ba, Marveaux and Santon start. For the time being we've gone with tried and tested players and bedding the new players in slowly. It's quite a sensible approach, especially if fitness is an issue and it has clealy been with Ba and Marv. How are we bedding them in slowly, if they're (Santon) not even playing? He should start today - Raylor proved that. Why in the world Santon didn't even get some minutes with Raylor being so shit, is beyond me. Santon needs to play, he's fit, in good form - no excuses what so ever. The sensible approach is rubbish - loads of managers and players have shown that.

How about starting with your best eleven, and making changes when they're obviously needed. That would be some great adapting by Pardew.

Ten times the defender Raylor is.

Are you happy with that performance and style of play? Nope, but I can see why we played like that. I think less resilient sides would have lost. Resilient We were just lucky as f***.

Raylor, Ameobi, Obertan - starting. Santon, Ba, Marveaux - bench. That's fucking hell for you. It's a disgrace - even you should see that. There is plenty of room to moan about it.

Exactly, said before the game, there is no way anyone should get p*ssed if he doesn't play when we have no idea where the level of his preparation is for the game. He's fit, had a great game for Italy a week ago or something, and ready to go. There's no fucking excuse to not put him on when our out of position left back as usual is fucking gash.