Jump to content

Scotty66

Member
  • Posts

    4,371
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Scotty66

  1. 1 minute ago, Stifler said:

    Every single betting company does this.

    They do verification and kyc checks but most of the big ones end up paying out. MGM will have you running in circles until you give up or go to the ombudsman.

     

  2. Not a great look that were partnered with Bet MGM at the minute. They're without doubt one of the most crooked betting sites out there. Refusing to honour people's bets and not paying out when people win big money. Asking for proof of yours and your wife's bank account statements etc.

    Yet they keep hiring famous people for their ads.

     

    If anyone thinks of using them because they're connected to us. Please don't.

  3. That can't be real. The sleeves are a complete mess. 3 straight lines, 2 random curves and at the bottom of the sleeve a complete white section that doesn't really match with anything.

    Kind of looks like two kits morphed into one.

    Shockingly overhyped if that's what it really is.

  4. Actually feel quite ashamed about how I used to think of him. Thought he was a bit shit and a grade A c**t before he signed for us. Thought we deserved better.

     

    In reality he's proper hard working, quality player and a real good lad.

     

    Just goes to prove that we don't really know fuck all about footballers apart from what we see on the pitch tbh [emoji38]

     

    Hope he scores a big goal for England this summer. Absolutely deserves it for the season he's had.

  5. 9 minutes ago, Checko said:

    Tbf the entire gambling industry works on the principle of 'you give us some money, on average we'll give you less back.'

    "And if you do manage to beat us long term we'll soon limit your account to 50p max stakes or ban you completely"

     

    But lose 50k with them in a month and nothing is said. 

  6. Why is Romano acting ITK when he's directly quoting the player [emoji38]

    Acting like he told Ramsdale himself what is going to happen.

     

    TBF he rarely gets it wrong, apart from Pedro to us typically which would have been an incredible signing imo.

  7. Said it last summer and I still think Edwards is used as their smokescreen.

     

    Drip feed him some "info" while actually going after someone completely different.

     

    Isn't this what happend with the Tonali deal, he said we were definitely going after someone else iirc.

  8. I just don't understand the curves on the side. Makes no sense what so ever on a shirt with so many straight lines. Clashes badly and looks awful.

     

    Maybe it will improve a little when being worn.

  9. Will always remember seeing him for the first time for us against Rangers in a friendly. Was sensational. Literally played like Pirlo that day.

  10. Not sure why but I get the feeling the name dropping about possible failure to agree with the council etc may be the plan from the start in order to build a new stadium. 

     

    Maybe just trying to gently ease it through with fans who don't want it?

  11. 54 minutes ago, sempuki said:

    Arda Guler mentioned again.

    By who?!

     

    No chance he leaves Real and absolutely no chance he comes here. He's the next golden boy for Madrid. 

  12. Can't really bash a player while he's playing with an injury. We have no idea how the pain/discomfort feels while he's playing. He was a big part of our success last season and quietly went about his business under the radar at times.

    He's not elite of course but he's no Jack Colback either.

  13. I didn't think it was a foul tbh. Yeah he nudged him but he caught him off balance. 

    Would that have been given as a penalty if it was reversed? I don't think so.

  14. Mate I really can't be fucked to keep going back and forward with you and it's not really a big deal. Why would I make it up?I've heard him myself say things like "city broke the rules" when at this moment they haven't been found guilty of that.

    Anyone that listens to him regularly can clearly see he thinks city are guilty and he digs them about it too. It's a dangerous thing to do involving court cases etc.

  15. 7 hours ago, Erikse said:

     

    Haven't checked on Carragher, but I have now looked through different articles on Simon Jordan comments regarding the case. As I said he is criticising how they are handling the investigation etc., and saying that if you are innocent then it should be easy for you to prove it. Which is true. Not a single time does he seem to say that they ARE guilty. He has however said that IF they are guilty, they should be punished very hard. But that's not saying that they are. I'm not a fan of Simon Jordan, but lets not put words into his mouth. Or maybe you could show me an example?

     

     

     

    It's not what he's written it's what he's said on talk sport. There's been numerous times it's come up in discussion and it's obvious that Jordan is having a dig and a snigger about it. Clearly implying they are guilty and will be charged to millions of people tuning in.

    I'm almost certain that if city go ahead with what they intend in that tweet I shared then Jordan's name will be one of those mentioned.

    He did it with us during the takeover, saying AS hasn't got the funds and that the Premier league will not ever approve the deal. He states his opinion as facts which can be very dangerous for things regarding the City charges etc .

×
×
  • Create New...