nufc123

I get it but you are just as hypocritical yourself. If you say thats not a penalty you cant come on your high horse and not defend it next time.

Aye clear shoulder to shoulder

Well isnt that going a bit against your view then? Not a thing today was anything, so you should defend it when we go over the line next time.

You are a great guy, but how you can say thats a perfect shoulder to shoulder tackle is beyond me.

Its not a shoulder duel when you are using your leg, hip and whole upper body into another player.

No thats not true.

Oh yes that would have been a disaster. Luckily he only whiped out Gordons hip and upper body first.

Im no better than anyone else, but when some are justifying that as shoulder to shoulder it baffles me.

Didnt you know that the hip and whole upper body counts as the shoulder?

Reading some utter weird stuff on this forum today.

A weird view how you think thats shoulder to shoulder when its a full body tackle.

Im not difficult in that regard. If we are lucky to escape I wont hide it.

But you said he had enough of a touch on the ball, wich is not true. He doesnt touch the ball first.

Cant believe people dont see that.

Said it was clear pen watching it live. That was not the point.

But he tackles Barnes before the ball hits James. Isnt that against the rules?

He doesnt hit the ball before he hits Barnes does he?

Watch it again!

Not been saying anything of that? You are question why we are getting corner instead of a pen ffs. James doesnt hit the ball. Are you reading or writing your own posts?

Sorry but this is getting stupid now. He tackles Barnes, end of story.

Becuase it bounces off James after he tackles Barnes. This is totally pointless if you dont watch it over.

How can you call that shoulder to shoulder when he puts his foot in front and in Gordon?

Of course, but many did say it was a penalty. Do you think the Manu brigade were saying corrupt in the Ferguson days?

I think we had 6 or 7 big chances. How many did Chelsea have?

No he didnt.