Jump to content

tarie4

Member
  • Posts

    153
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Perhaps, but the club's much publicised pursuit of Guehi suggests they had a plan to compensate for the acquisition, possibly through player sales as you say or other means, or maybe we have a bit of PSR wiggle room. Its all speculation and a matter of opinion. A matter of fact though is the club were willing to spend money for Guehi.
  2. Perhaps. Even if the figure was 55 million, our transfer activity would still have been substantial, and it was reported that we met Olise's release clause. which was also around 50 million or so. Point still stands. We are capable of spending large amounts for what the club consider the right player.
  3. Palace agree to 70 million for their super star defender and we in excess of 100 million spend in the summer, or even the 60 million for their true superstar in Olise. I think money is there to spend on the right player.
  4. tarie4

    Alexander Isak

    80 million for Isak is a joke, it's insulting. He's contracted to the club till June 2028, and he's worth way more than that. It's mind-boggling how you think it's not. It's astonishing, really. I disagree with all the bolded parts. Everyone is entitled to an opinion I guess, but 80 million for Isak not insulting? Wow. Just wow.
  5. tarie4

    Alexander Isak

    Moisés Caicedo went for 115 million.
  6. tarie4

    Alexander Isak

    Give him 200 a week and a 2 year extension. That ties him down till 2030 when he is 30/31. We should not entertain selling him for any fee. Build the team around him, Gordon, livra, hall and botman.
  7. I'd be shocked if he makes it through this international break..
  8. Brighton making it rather easy for Chelsea.
  9. Brighton better quite the highline, it's suicidal.
  10. What's going on in the Chelsea game. ??
  11. "5 to 10 years" was the direct quote from Amanda.
  12. I think you are missing my point there my good sir.
×
×
  • Create New...