nazza06 Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 controversy today. Heskey- definately onside, Carvalho was still intervering with play. 2 penalties in Arsenal blackburn game- definately no peno for blackburn, pathetic dive from Bentley, No peno against van persie for me, definate dive and i think the ref thought so too after making the decision because he gave a yellow card to the last man :confused: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 I thought Carvalho wasn't active as he was off the pitch, making Heskey offside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 I thought Carvalho wasn't active as he was off the pitch, making Heskey offside. Aye, that's right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazza06 Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 I thought Carvalho wasn't active as he was off the pitch, making Heskey offside. but he was intending to come back onto the pitch to win the ball, he is still involved in play. So what if heskey had been off the pitch too and the ball cam in and he stuck a foot onto the pitch and knocked it in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Martins offside for his goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamesD Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 he was in the process of coming back onto the pitch. just becuase you step out of bounds doesnt mean you're inactive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 I thought Carvalho wasn't active as he was off the pitch, making Heskey offside. but he was intending to come back onto the pitch to win the ball, he is still involved in play. So what if heskey had been off the pitch too and the ball cam in and he stuck a foot onto the pitch and knocked it in? To win the ball? He wasn't anywhere near close enough to get to Heskey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazza06 Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 I thought Carvalho wasn't active as he was off the pitch, making Heskey offside. but he was intending to come back onto the pitch to win the ball, he is still involved in play. So what if heskey had been off the pitch too and the ball cam in and he stuck a foot onto the pitch and knocked it in? To win the ball? He wasn't anywhere near close enough to get to Heskey. he was still moving towards heskey. From what your saying then when a player goes off the pitch he becomes inavtive in play and therefore he should need the referee's permission to go back onto the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 He doesn't need the ref's permission to come back on in that circumstance. But if he's off the field of play I thought he was then inactive, making Heskey offside. That's just what I thought the rule was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Wasn't it Boulahrouz anyway? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Wasn't it Boulahrouz anyway? Yes it was. :oops: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazza06 Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 He doesn't need the ref's permission to come back on in that circumstance. But if he's off the field of play I thought he was then inactive, making Heskey offside. That's just what I thought the rule was. that contradicts itself. What would you say if a player walked off the pitch to make another offside? would he then become inactive? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 He'd get sent off for being a shithead? What's the definitive answer Paul/Aphro? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Add Dickov's headed "goal" to this list. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazza06 Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 more controversy. Diouf was surely interfering with play for anelkas goal!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazza06 Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 no way a sending off for Barton, yellow but no more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedudeabides Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Blatant Reading penalty denied at 0-1.......could have changed the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamesD Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 agree for both of those nazza. barton, had he made real contact, would have been a red...but he sorta missed. and diouf pretty much made a dummy run to let anelka in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Again, I thought contact didn't matter. They can send someone off for the 'intent' can they not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazza06 Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Blatant Reading penalty denied at 0-1.......could have changed the game. i thought that at first but on replays i think he dived. yellow card straight away for any dive in my book. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Diouf was definitely interfering there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 no way a sending off for Barton, yellow but no more. He looked a proper tit the way he dived in like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Dyer not booked for putting his shirt over his head. Shocking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Parker defo offside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 Parker defo offside. Just the 3 yards :wink: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now