Guest gggg Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Cant see Carrick and Hargreaves starting in the same team much but you just have to look at how many games Fletcher gets to see they need a bigger squad, plus Fergie seems to prefer the 3 in midfield in europe for some reason even though it doesnt work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 hargreaves and carrick a bit simialar to play together? both a bit defensive Sisoko (sp?) and Alonso work fairly well together. Because like Carrick and Canadian Owen, they are different types of player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 hargreaves and carrick a bit simialar to play together? both a bit defensive No, i think Hargreaves plays deeper. However, it doesn't smack of the most dynamic, exciting midfield, does it?? I still get the impression Carrick was a desperation buy. ......... and a big name signing that chelsea didn't want Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 hargreaves and carrick a bit simialar to play together? both a bit defensive No, i think Hargreaves plays deeper. However, it doesn't smack of the most dynamic, exciting midfield, does it?? I still get the impression Carrick was a desperation buy. ......... and a big name signing that chelsea didn't want Which has to be a one-off!! Clearly Roman hadn't heard of him...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now