BlueStar Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? Come on Alex, he clearly spelled it out for you. Subtley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 Vic is hurting right now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 yes, because that translated as me supporting Roeder didnt it? Yes, because that's what I was saying you triple banker. oh right, you just decided to post that completely independantly of what had gone before? I did a little search for your posts involving the word Roeder just to make sure I hadn't dreamtwhat you'd posted about him in the past and it turns out it's quite a comedy gold mine... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? I wanted to stick with ONE manager for more than 1 year, it wouldn't matter who it was Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 yes, because that translated as me supporting Roeder didnt it? Yes, because that's what I was saying you triple banker. oh right, you just decided to post that completely independantly of what had gone before? I did a little search for your posts involving the word Roeder just to make sure I hadn't dreamtwhat you'd posted about him in the past and it turns out it's quite a comedy gold mine... you really should put a disclaimer on your posts then if you intend on having no relation between succesive posts, as that is the purpose of a message board Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? I wanted to stick with ONE manager for more than 1 year, it wouldn't matter who it was So, you wanted to stick with Roeder then, given he was the manager at the time. Which is what I said, isn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? I wanted to stick with ONE manager for more than 1 year, it wouldn't matter who it wa But that manager was Roeder. Hence you wanted to stick with Roeder. Or you wanted to stick with someone else somehow? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 yes, because that translated as me supporting Roeder didnt it? Yes, because that's what I was saying you triple banker. oh right, you just decided to post that completely independantly of what had gone before? I did a little search for your posts involving the word Roeder just to make sure I hadn't dreamtwhat you'd posted about him in the past and it turns out it's quite a comedy gold mine... you really should put a disclaimer on your posts then if you intend on having no relation between succesive posts, as that is the purpose of a message board I think you really should stick a disclaimer on your posts that they have no relation to reality... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 It doesn't matter who the manager is, we should stick with him for more than a year. A bit different to Vic/SSH* wanting Allardyce sacked as soon as he was appointed over on Toontastic. Good stuff this like *Assuming they're the same bloke Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? I wanted to stick with ONE manager for more than 1 year, it wouldn't matter who it was So, you wanted to stick with Roeder then, given he was the manager at the time. Which is what I said, isn't it? I know you can't understand this, but sticking with Roeder does not necessarily mean you support Roeder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? I wanted to stick with ONE manager for more than 1 year, it wouldn't matter who it was So, you wanted to stick with Roeder then, given he was the manager at the time. Which is what I said, isn't it? I know you can't understand this, but sticking with Roeder does not necessarily mean you support Roeder. I know what you mean John. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 I know you can't understand this, but sticking with Roeder does not necessarily mean you support Roeder. HAD ON, one fucking minute, you're moving the goalposts here. You now admit you wanted to stick with Roeder? What you told Alex he was wrong about wasn't about supporting Roeder, it was about sticking with Roeder. Vic wanted to stick with Roeder iirc. Some good sense there. you recall wrongly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? I wanted to stick with ONE manager for more than 1 year, it wouldn't matter who it was So, you wanted to stick with Roeder then, given he was the manager at the time. Which is what I said, isn't it? I know you can't understand this, but sticking with Roeder does not necessarily mean you support Roeder. You're the one who mentioned the word 'support' though. I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, you said I had recalled that incorrectly (one page ago if you'd like to check). Now you're admitting you did want to stick with him. Jesus man, are you trying to make yourself look daft? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? I wanted to stick with ONE manager for more than 1 year, it wouldn't matter who it was So, you wanted to stick with Roeder then, given he was the manager at the time. Which is what I said, isn't it? I know you can't understand this, but sticking with Roeder does not necessarily mean you support Roeder. You're the one who mentioned the word 'support' though. I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, you said I had recalled that incorrectly (one page ago if you'd like to check). Now you're admitting you did want to stick with him. Jesus man, are you trying to make yourself look daft? if you attribute your original post as not implying support for Roeder, then it's not me who looks daft right now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 It meant what it said tbh. Funnily enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 you recall wrongly ORLY? yes Well, I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, can you explain how you weren't advocating that in that thread? I wanted to stick with ONE manager for more than 1 year, it wouldn't matter who it was So, you wanted to stick with Roeder then, given he was the manager at the time. Which is what I said, isn't it? I know you can't understand this, but sticking with Roeder does not necessarily mean you support Roeder. You're the one who mentioned the word 'support' though. I said you wanted to stick with Roeder, you said I had recalled that incorrectly (one page ago if you'd like to check). Now you're admitting you did want to stick with him. Jesus man, are you trying to make yourself look daft? if you attribute your original post as not implying support for Roeder, then it's not me who looks daft right now It definitely is you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 A classic case of the Vicky Pollards. Yeah, but no, but yeah, but. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 It was a one sentence post man, it wasn't an Oscar Wilde poem for fucks sake, how do you get this intricately woven tapestry of metaphor and hidden meaning out of it? You could have at least said "This post actually means I supported Roeder therefore Alex recalled wrongly because I only wanted to stick with him like he said but didn't actually mean" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 It definitely is SSH/Vic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Knightrider Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 Vic, more faces than Mount Rushmore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 Vic, more faces than Mount Rushmore I know you have a problem with it coach, but I'd wager the majority of people understand the difference between a manager not being fired after a year in a job with the same boss because that boss has gone through 5 managers in 10 years, and a new owner perhaps wanting to install his own manager irregardless of when he was appointed granted I know this may upset you because your hero might actually have to take a break from football, just like he promised his former employer and best mate that he would do Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 It was a one sentence post man, it wasn't an Oscar Wilde poem for fucks sake, how do you get this intricately woven tapestry of metaphor and hidden meaning out of it? You could have at least said "This post actually means I supported Roeder therefore Alex recalled wrongly because I only wanted to stick with him like he said but didn't actually mean" fucking listen to yourself, as if anyone ever posts like that FFS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 Come back to the bitter Bolton fan phase then... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 I only posted "Vic wanted to stick with Roeder iirc." as I thought he was being a bit of an arse and I hoped for a bite/denial. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 I only posted "Vic wanted to stick with Roeder iirc." as I thought he was being a bit of an arse and I hoped for a bite/denial. denial of what? now you've explained what you literally wrote is what you literally mean, rather than how 95% would have interpreted it, then I am in full agreement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now