Flip

That the ref is horrible. Only thing I've said.

:lol: FFS.

Thats more of a dive. Ref is horrible.

Nah refs been great. Excellent game.

The referee has had a good game tbh. :lol: So that's not a penalty then?

Exactly what the league wants, title race back on. Clearly been robbed here. Referee has been so inconsistent it's embarrassing. Has happened to us more than a couple of times this season as well. PL referees are paid good money in regards to the collegues elswhere arent they? And they can't even do the simplest thing of them all, being consistent. Its like the write a new rule book every now and then.

Carroll was doing the same and the ref chose the penalty instead of the free-kick for Leicester.

This ref is great. Another great decision. He's on a one man mission to kill their title.

Clear dive, you don't go that high up in the air by a tackle or being tripped. Well there's a difference between exaggerating contact and diving. I thought that there was a tangle of the legs and that, along with the pressure from the defender, put him off balance. Not saying it was a foul by Ogbonna either by the way, rather a fairly innocuous coming-together in the penalty box. He caused the contact! It's diving if you throw your body into another person and fall over! Bunch of modern day football mugs. He hardly 'throws' his body into Ogbonna. He plants his foot in between the defender's legs and the ball and their momentum carries them over. Players put themselves in between the ball and the other player all the time. FWIW, I didn't say in my original post that it unequivocally wasn't a dive, but the incident's ambiguous enough to not warrant the yellow card imo. The ball was on the other side Other side?

He's not even being funny, he's jsut rattled. Semtex is pissed off because everyone doesn't agree with him.

How about the one for miles? Is that the Brazilian as well?

I've seen every angle possible and can clearly see the ball right there. But clearly we both have a different definition of dive and miles as well for that matter.

Leicester lucky to have Kante. Playing 11v11 now with a man off and him on the pitch Guy is everywhere always.

"Put his body infront of the West Ham player" ffs So f***ing Brazilian. Let's just say he jumped into the WH player, dangerous play, straight red. Don't make this a thing about nationality. I'm sitting with bunch of Swedes who agree. Commentator said the same, really harsh decision from the ref. :lol: It's a clear dive. Don't prontonise me nees. I'm not the only one that doesn't think it's a clear dive. For me it's not a dive at all actually. He throws himself to the ground dramatically, but he's going down no matter how you spin it since the West Ham player runs into him from behind. Only the West Ham player doesn't run into him, he runs into the West Ham player to fake the foul and try and con the referee into giving a penalty = dive. I definitely don't agree with this. But each to their own.

Clear dive, you don't go that high up in the air by a tackle or being tripped. Well there's a difference between exaggerating contact and diving. I thought that there was a tangle of the legs and that, along with the pressure from the defender, put him off balance. Not saying it was a foul by Ogbonna either by the way, rather a fairly innocuous coming-together in the penalty box. This x 1000. IMO at least.

It's a clear dive, his only intention was to jump into the defender and bounce off him to con the referee into giving a penalty. Correct decision. He's ahead of the West Ham player ffs. How does he jump into the defender?

:lol: It's a clear dive. Don't prontonise me nees. I'm not the only one that doesn't think it's a clear dive. For me it's not a dive at all actually. He throws himself to the ground dramatically, but he's going down no matter how you spin it since the West Ham player runs into him from behind.

Same. Same. Thought play should've probably just gone on. Closer to a penalty than a dive in my opinion.

Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion.

You're right, Neymar should've walked for violent conduct. In that case Juanfran, Godin and Gabi shouldve walked as well. Get lost. Obnoxious as f***. Didn't see them seriously assaulting a player off the ball (not to mention field of play) because they were getting beat myself. Feel free to reference. Godin did it twice. Gabi shouldve ahd a yellow and I think you can count the amount of Juanfrans kicking from behind on two hands which shouldve resulted in yellow cards. Watch the game next time. Over two legs Atletico were the better team and much deserved. Simeone is a maniac Him v Guardiola in the final would be well appreciated by me.

You're right, Neymar should've walked for violent conduct. In that case Juanfran, Godin and Gabi shouldve walked as well. Get lost. Obnoxious as fuck.

Messi must've been kidnapped two weeks ago. Fuck happened to him? How can you be this uninterested in a CL quarterfinal? He made one run defensively, but that was all he gave for these 180minutes. Abysmal. Barcelona have been bad, shows how much they rely on Messi supplying the ball however, Neymar and Suarez tried but it's just too easy when youre defending against 10. Thought Rakitic was horrible as well. Ref was bad, but Barcelona has had many decisions in their favour this season so they can't complain about that handball. Must be the first game I thought the ref was actually biased against Barcelona. Leaves it open for the best manager in the world to win it however.

City bit lucky imo to be through. Been dog shit for most parts of 180minutes.

De Bruyne is the difference between City being an average side and a very good side. Great buy.