Jump to content

SAK

Member
  • Posts

    2,638
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SAK

  1. 52 minutes ago, NSG said:


    Tough to move someone on who is out for 9 months with an ACL like 

    He signed a one year contract extension I recall so by the time he recovers his contract will nearly be up. Unlikely to be further extended as too risky. He’ll be let go but if he hasn’t fully recovered the club will likely still provide medical/physio support.

  2. Just now, andycap said:

    Typical the Germans make a resurgence this year and the English clubs falter. Which could in turn give them extra spots in Europe and the English losing out. 

    Premier league shot itself in the foot with all the self imposed restrictions.

  3. 4 minutes ago, timeEd32 said:

     

    I don't think so because the specifics of their case can't really be replicated. The rules have evolved to prevent a good amount of what they did in the future, so Man City II would have been stopped or punished along the way. And, thus, they would not have become so big / successful, which is what has made this so messy.

    As I understand it aren’t the charges re fake sponsors and making payments via third parties to staff to keep costs of city’s books plus non compliance in assisting investigating authorities? Not saying we should create fake sponsors or pay players off the books but if we did overspend instead of a points deduction couldn’t we argue City were treated different for doing far worse and that we wanted to negotiate a financial settlement?

×
×
  • Create New...