bowlingcrofty

Nor is it supposed to change it..it's supposed to explain it with statistics Why are you so angry against a statistic that just helps to paint a picture?

I'm actually not 100% certain on when this was signed, I think it may have been early in the 93/94 season...as it looks suspiciously like that P.Bxxxxx above the E is actually Peter Beardsley, looking at the way the P is written and comparing to his autographs online.

Tremendous - cheers. And ditto. Two more crossed off!

This is my kit from when I was a bairn, signed by the promotion squad. Few on there I still haven't identified. But it's worth a fortune I reckon. Up on the boy's wall in his bedroom currently. Bought an adult sized version of it about 10 years ago for £40 and it's still pristine. Couldn't ever part with it.

There's probably some mileage in that because it would incentivise them to actually play their academy players as well.

There’s no sponsors on the training gear so it won’t end up old with an old sponsor, it’s not tied to a particular season really - it’s just nice adidas x NUFC gear. I’ve no clue how it can be described as a money grab. Nobody buys it to have the ‘latest’ gear.

So what they do to make it fair, is they say - OK, we can all spend a percentage of what our own Scalextrics sets are worth to keep upgrading it. That's a fair system, isn't it? In reality the six rich kids get to spend a lot more on their already-expensive sets, and we get to spend far less on a set that wasn't worth as much to start with.

I believe the earlier batch of those asics kits came with the embroidered asics logo, and latter batches had the rubberised/flock version.

Really enjoyed yesterday lads and lasses, was a good few games, tight matches as well. Up the B&Ws

Looking forward to this!

Aye fair enough - I'm in.

Who are we going to loan? As soon as we're involved, there'll be outrageous loan fees no doubt.

Sad thing is that essentially the Anderson and Minteh stuff is almost like a previous transfer window. They bear no significance to this one, because they were sold to solve a PSR Issue for last year, not this one. Such are the stupid fucking rules we have to play by.

If an apology is the "least we deserve" then what the fuck is the most we deserve?!