Jump to content

Wilson

Member
  • Posts

    17,689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wilson

  1. Currently on Aldis Rheinbacher. Will do until it's official.
  2. I don't think it's a coincidence getting reports of 'done' after all the hints and general feeling about it since yesterday. The nay sayers can fuck off now. I'm allowing myself to get excited.
  3. 'there might be a few legal issues, depending on your view' What the f*** is that meant to mean? Surely your view doesnt matter when it comes to the legality of something, its either legal or it isn't. Unless I'm just reading that wrong. It's how the world works. If you don't like something and can afford it one way of trying to stop it is to employ the best lawyers around to go searching for other legitimate legal reasons to try and stop something. Yes I understand they can get people to search for any legal issues, but that's not a matter of your view is it? Your view could be 'that's illegal' but the law says 'no its not', and that's the end of it. Just saying that a persons view makes no odds to how legal something is, so don't understand why he said it. Well it does. Because the law isn't as straight forward as that. You often get top Queens Counsel arguing different interpretations of the law, for example. Fair enough Always assumed with stuff like this (epl checks with set rules) that it would be either legal or illegal. Don't know enough about it to be disagreeing.
  4. 'there might be a few legal issues, depending on your view' What the f*** is that meant to mean? Surely your view doesnt matter when it comes to the legality of something, its either legal or it isn't. Unless I'm just reading that wrong. It's how the world works. If you don't like something and can afford it one way of trying to stop it is to employ the best lawyers around to go searching for other legitimate legal reasons to try and stop something. Yes I understand they can get people to search for any legal issues, but that's not a matter of your view is it? Your view could be 'that's illegal' but the law says 'no its not', and that's the end of it. Just saying that a persons view makes no odds to how legal something is, so don't understand why he said it.
  5. 'there might be a few legal issues, depending on your view' What the fuck is that meant to mean? Surely your view doesnt matter when it comes to the legality of something, its either legal or it isn't. Unless I'm just reading that wrong.
  6. There’s thousands of planes in the sky. What’s the relevance of that one? It's the cash plane.
  7. Highlight of the thread in a mess of absolute shite. Brilliant.
  8. Just had the unfortunate realisation that i had added people to my buddie list instead of ignore list.
  9. I get this john richardson bit, but what other news outlets does he mean?
  10. He certainly seems confident again like, just sure we've been here before. I'm trying not to read anything into anything anyone says keeping me fairly sane. As much as I trust Caulkin and believe what he says, one thing we've learned is that there's always something else to slow it down.
  11. Sat with a 5am saint, still have the celebratory La Chouffe etc that I bought at Rehills weeks ago Just announce something so we can consign this thread to history.
  12. Another day closer, media reports seem to have calmed down, no more teeth jokes over night.
  13. My guess is that the buyers know what is going on, as they'll be answering a fuck load of questions so will be fully aware n of what is holding it up. Fatty on the other hand is probably sitting with his thumb up his arse waiting for the back balance to go up.
  14. According to caulkin the buyers have been working thru it with the PL answering questions etc. Doesn’t sound like it’s been largely untouched Aye, just another case of bedwetting and putting timelines on shit based on absolutely nowt other than, well, bedwetting.
  15. I reckon it'll take a week for people to stop putting timeliness on it. Nice.
×
×
  • Create New...