Jagten

He's really a striker fwiw. He gives a lot of good goalscoring but not much else. He only made like 500 passes for West Ham in open play last season or something, despite playing 33.5 90s.

Wilson is 32, has had two ACLs and has 1 year left on his contract. His numbers are still excellent, but I can’t see a PL club giving him more than a 2 (maybe 3) year deal, so his book cost would be huge at anything other than a nominal fee.

This ain’t true. Lots of reservations about his ceiling and price. Nowhere near as unanimous as when we bought Bruno, for example.

This is mostly for accounting purposes. Digne’s contract will be very hard to sell.

Looking like Jeff Hendrick here. This is dreadful

Not remotely.

It's very difficult, without asking him, to know what he's responsible for. There were some very good (Upamecano, Konate) and very bad (Burke, Augustin, Bruma) signings at RBL when he was their chief scout.

By all accounts he is pretty uncomfortable on the ball.

This is just engagement farming. Not entirely convinced he even supports them.

Unless I'm missing something, I don't see why Brentford, after likely losing Toney, would be willing sellers. For the money and with our ambitions + restrictions, (I'm guessing) 40m should get us some option on a potentially elite player, which I don't think (?) is him.

It’s really an expression for the low probability of repeating the same recruiting, especially given lack of market depth, big demand for 6s and our existing lack of progressive passers. The probability of having a successful outcome selling him is not 0, but the price required for it to be bigger than 0.5 is, imo, extremely big.

"Free" is never free. Usually, it just means taking <50% of the transfer value and giving it as an addition to the agent and the player.

For a lot of the game this was true but this interpretation is not correct. The accumulative xG doesn’t tell you about the variance or the game state, so you can’t derive an implied scoreline. You are, for example, much more likely to score 0 goals from 468 shots of 0.01 xG vs 5 of .936 xG (close to 10000x more likely). The accumulation was also conditional on PSG failing to score. Should they have scored, their number doesn’t end up so high.

Atletico Madrid was only a loan offer, if it is to be believed. Otherwise, he's a 32 y/o with two previous ACLs, who's missed 65 games over the last three seasons, with one year left on his deal. I don't think it's worth selling him for whatever nominal amount we might get.

Isak hit .6 p/ 90 at 20 over 30 starts, which is higher than David has at any point in his career. Isak’s general game is of a higher technical standard, and they are not comparable here. Isak always had superstar potential, which he is now realizing. 30m + considerable agent fees and sign-on, salary is a lot of money. In our position, it’s do-not-miss money. I think the chance of that is too high.